The removal of boron from model solutions and seawater using reverse osmosis membranes

被引:41
|
作者
Koseoglu, H. [1 ]
Kabay, N. [2 ]
Yueksel, M. [2 ]
Kitis, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Environm Engn, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Chem Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
boron; desalination; membrane; model solution; reverse osmosis; seawater; SWRO;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.189
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The main objective of this work was to investigate and compare the removals of boron from model solutions (boron as single solute in distilled and deionized water) and seawater using two commercial high rejection SWRO membranes. The impacts of dissolved solids in seawater and pH on boron rejection and permeate flux were determined. A lab-scale cross-flow flat-sheet configuration test unit was used for all RO experiments. Much higher boron rejections were obtained in model solutions than seawater at a pH of 8.2, while boron rejections >98% were consistently achieved at pH 10.5 by both membranes in model solutions and seawater. Consistent for both pH levels, lower permeate flux values were observed in seawater than model solutions at constant conditions due to much higher osmotic pressures in seawater. Increasing pH from 8.2 to 10.5 decreased the flux values in seawater at constant membrane pressure, mainly due to membrane fouling and enhanced, scale formation by Mg and Ca compounds. As the pressure was increased from 41.3 to 55.2 bar higher boron rejections were observed in seawater. High salinity levels in seawater reduced the rejection of boron by SWRO membranes compared to rejection of boron as single solute. On the other hand, by enhancing boron rejections due to a shift towards charged boron species, increasing seawater pH to 10.5 compensated the negative impacts of dissolved solids in the seawater on boron rejections. However, such advantages of increase in pH occurred at the expense of reduced permeate flux.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by reverse osmosis using cellulose acetate membranes
    Bódalo, A
    Gómez, JL
    Gómez, E
    León, G
    Tejera, M
    DESALINATION, 2005, 184 (1-3) : 149 - 155
  • [12] Influence of biofouling on boron removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Huertas, Esther
    Herzberg, Moshe
    Oron, Gideon
    Elimelech, Menachem
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 318 (1-2) : 264 - 270
  • [13] Novel high boron removal polyamide reverse osmosis membranes
    Wang, Shuhao
    Zhou, Yong
    Gao, Congjie
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 554 : 244 - 252
  • [14] Boron removal from seawater reverse osmosis permeate utilizing selective ion exchange resin
    Nadav, N
    DESALINATION, 1999, 124 (1-3) : 131 - 135
  • [15] Boron removal from seawater reverse osmosis permeate: A Hasse diagram analysis of current technologies
    Bick, Amos
    Oron, Gideon
    DESALINATION, 2013, 310 : 34 - 38
  • [16] Fabrication of fluorinated polyamide seawater reverse osmosis membrane with enhanced boron removal
    Li, Can
    Zhao, Yali
    Lai, Gwo Sung
    Wang, Rong
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2022, 662
  • [17] Boron removal from aqueous solution by reverse osmosis
    Oeztuerk, Nese
    Kavak, Duygu
    Koese, T. Ennil
    DESALINATION, 2008, 223 (1-3) : 1 - 9
  • [18] Boron removal by reverse osmosis.
    Oo, MH
    Qin, JJ
    Lee, H
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U978 - U978
  • [19] Boron Removal from Desalinated Seawater for Irrigation with an On-Farm Reverse Osmosis System in Southeastern Spain
    Imbernon-Mulero, Alberto
    Gallego-Elvira, Belen
    Martinez-Alvarez, Victoriano
    Martin-Gorriz, Bernardo
    Molina-del-Toro, Ruben
    Jodar-Conesa, Francisco J.
    Maestre-Valero, Jose F.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [20] Performance assessment of seawater reverse osmosis membranes
    Ebrahim, S
    Abdel-Jawad, M
    Al-Saffar, A
    Al-Tabtabaie, M
    DESALINATION, 1998, 119 (1-3) : 207 - 207