Analyzing the effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity

被引:25
作者
Li, Qiaomin [1 ]
Scollay, Robert [2 ]
Gilbert, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Auckland, Business Sch, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Utah State Univ, Huntsman Sch Business, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
RCEP; FDI; Firm heterogeneity; CGE; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TRADE; SERVICES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a free trade agreement (FTA) that is currently under negotiation among China and 15 other Asian countries. It is one of several potential mega-regional FTAs in the Asia-Pacific region. In this paper we investigate the potential effect of RCEP on foreign direct investment (FDI) with a focus on China using an innovative computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The model is built on the theory of firm heterogeneity extended to FDI. The framework is able to capture FDI increases along both the intensive and extensive margins. Liberalization under RCEP is simulated as impacting on FDI both directly through FDI liberalization and indirectly through trade liberalization. Our simulation results suggest that RCEP would encourage significant increases in FDI to China through both these pathways. While competition from imports drives out the least productive foreign owned firms, export expansion of firms using FDI will lead to an overall increase in foreign investment. In addition, the facilitation of trade in intermediate goods tends to promote vertical FDI. The direct FDI effect from investment liberalization will evidently promote FDI from partners. Projected economic gains to China from RCEP are in the range of US$103-214 billion, or 1.1-2.2% of GDP.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 420
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Adams R., 2003, The trade and investment effects of preferential trading arrangements-Old and new evidence
[2]  
Akgul Z., 2014, Introducing firm heterogeneity into the GTAP model
[3]  
Athukorala P.-C., 2005, P GLOB REG SYDN
[4]  
Dee P, 2000, MULTILATERAL LIBERAL, P34
[5]  
Fukui T., 2012, 24 GTAP, V24, P47
[6]  
Fukunaga Y., 2013, ERIA DISCUSSION PAPE, VERIA-DP-2013-02, P38
[7]  
Gilbert J, 2016, 1572016 ARTNET
[8]  
Hanslow K, 2000, STRUCTURE MAP MODEL
[9]  
Hanslow K, 2000, P 3 ANN C GLOB EC AN
[10]  
Helble Mathias., 2007, Transparency and trade facilitation in the Asia Pacific: estimating the gain from reform