Pain Intensity Assessment Scales for Dermatologic Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review

被引:2
作者
Govas, Panayiota [1 ]
Ketchum, Andrea [2 ]
Kazi, Rashek [1 ]
Gordon, Beth R. [1 ]
Carroll, Bryan T. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Hlth Sci Lib Syst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Dermatol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Dermatol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
VISUAL ANALOG SCALES; NUMERICAL RATING-SCALE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; SELF-REPORT; MEASUREMENT TOOLS; SEVERITY; ADULTS; CARE; PREFERENCE; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/DSS.0000000000003353
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pain assessment plays an important role in dermatologic surgery. The numeric rating scale (NRS), visual analog scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), and Faces Pain Scale (FPS) are commonly used scales for pain measurement. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the use of each. Prompt pain recognition and treatment during procedures result in higher patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE Determine the most applicable scale for acute pain measurement in dermatologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA-Supplemental Digital Content 4, (PROSPERO; CRD42018091058). PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between April 24, 2018, and May 06, 2018. The search query consisted of pain, pain measurement (NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS), and assessment/comparison. The inclusion criteria included English language literature with primary/secondary outcome objectives directly comparing >= 2 pain scales in acute pain (age: 13+). Study end points included interscale correlations, patient preferences, provider preferences, study author recommendations, and failure rates. RESULTS Eight hundred seven studies were retrieved: A total of 42 studies were included. The visual analog scale (n = 42) was most studied, followed by NRS (n = 29), VRS (n = 27), and FPS (n = 11). 93.1% studies showed a high statistical correlation between VAS and NRS. Patients preferred NRS (n = 8/11), followed by FPS (n = 3/11), VRS (n = 2/11), and VAS (n = 1/11). Study authors recommended NRS/VAS (n = 8/19), VRS (n = 6/19), and FPS (n = 1/19). Providers preferred NRS (n = 2/3) and VRS (n = 1/3). The visual analog scale had the highest failure rate (n = 11/12). CONCLUSION The numeric rating scale is most applicable for dermatologic surgery because of reported patient and provider preferences, lowest failure rates, and most frequent study author recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Akinpelu A O, 2002, Afr J Med Med Sci, V31, P123
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1989, DERMATOL CLIN, V7, P609
  • [3] What pain scales do nurses use in the postanaesthesia care unit?
    Aubrun, E
    Paqueron, X
    Langeron, O
    Coriat, P
    Riou, B
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (09) : 745 - 749
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF THREE SELF-REPORT PAIN SCALES IN ADULTS WITH ACUTE PAIN
    Bahreini, Maryam
    Jalili, Mohammad
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 48 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [5] Pain assessment of the intratympanic injections: a prospective comparative study
    Belhassen, Sarah
    Saliba, Issam
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 269 (12) : 2467 - 2473
  • [6] Assessing pain and pain relief in geriatric patients with non-pathological fractures with different rating scales
    Bergh, I
    Sjöström, B
    Odén, A
    Steen, B
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (05) : 355 - 361
  • [7] Comparative study of methods of measuring acute pain intensity in an ED
    Berthier, F
    Potel, G
    Leconte, P
    Touze, MD
    Baron, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 16 (02) : 132 - 136
  • [8] THE FACES PAIN SCALE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PAIN EXPERIENCED BY CHILDREN - DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL VALIDATION, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FOR RATIO SCALE PROPERTIES
    BIERI, D
    REEVE, RA
    CHAMPION, GD
    ADDICOAT, L
    ZIEGLER, JB
    [J]. PAIN, 1990, 41 (02) : 139 - 150
  • [9] Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department
    Bijur, PE
    Latimer, CT
    Gallagher, EJ
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (04) : 390 - 392
  • [10] A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients
    Briggs, M
    Closs, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (06) : 438 - 446