Comparative ecological network pattern analysis: a case of Nanchang

被引:16
作者
Ma, Binbin [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zhu-an [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Xiaojian [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiuquan [3 ]
Zhang, Liting [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Technol, Key Lab Digital Land & Resources Jiangxi Prov, Nanchang 30013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Technol, Sch Geomat, Nanchang 30013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecological source; Ecological network; MSPA; MCR; Ecological corridors; HABITAT PATCHES; LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY; GENE FLOW; CONSERVATION; CORRIDORS; IDENTIFICATION; AVAILABILITY; INDEXES; REGION; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-17808-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban-ecological landscape connectivity and pattern optimization can significantly enhance biodiversity and sustainable development capacity, which play an important role in continued ecosystem functioning. Previous studies identified ecological sources based on the area threshold method or combination with morphological spatial pattern analysis and the landscape connectivity index (CMSPACI) method, but few studies have compared the advantages, disadvantages, and applicability of the two methods. In this paper, taking Nanchang as the study area, we address the ecological sources via area threshold and the CMSPACI method. Then, the minimum cost distance method is used to generate potential corridors of different methods, and the differences in ecological networks are analyzed. Finally, the circuit theory is used to identify barriers, and we provide targeted recommendations for ecological network pattern optimization in the study area. The results show that (1) the ecological sources extracted by different methods are different. The ecological sources extracted by the area threshold are far away from the surrounding sources, and the landscape connectivity is low. The ecological sources identified by the CMSPACI method are closely related to the surrounding sources, and the landscape connectivity is high. (2) Compared with the area threshold method, the habitat quality of corridors under the CMSPACI method is better, and the interaction intensity between patches is larger. (3) There is little difference in the number of ecological barriers under different methods; all of them are located between patches or on the edge of patches, and most of them are roads or construction land. Overall, the area threshold method is simpler. Ecological sources can be effectively addressed through the CMSPACI method, and the landscape connectivity of the ecological network will be better. This study provides an important reference for the selection of ecological sources in the construction of ecological networks.
引用
收藏
页码:37423 / 37434
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Designing a coherent ecological network for large mammals in northwestern Europe [J].
Bruinderink, GG ;
Van Der Sluis, T ;
Lammertsma, D ;
Opdam, P ;
Pouwels, R .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (02) :549-557
[2]   Landscape typology and ecological connectivity assessment to inform Greenway design [J].
Carlier, Julien ;
Moran, James .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 651 :3241-3252
[3]   Establishing archipelagic landscape ecological network with full connectivity at dual spatial scales [J].
Chi, Yuan ;
Xie, Zuolun ;
Wang, Jing .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2019, 399 :54-65
[4]   Ranking European regions as providers of structural riparian corridors for conservation and management purposes [J].
Clerici, Nicola ;
Vogt, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2013, 21 :477-483
[5]   Construction and optimization of green space ecological networks in urban fringe areas: A case study with the urban fringe area of Tongzhou district in Beijing [J].
Cui, Liu ;
Wang, Jia ;
Sun, Lu ;
Lv, Chundong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276
[6]   Trading connectivity improvement for area loss in patch-based biodiversity reserve networks [J].
Dalang, Thomas ;
Hersperger, Anna M. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 148 (01) :116-125
[7]   Integrating spatial continuous wavelet transform and kernel density estimation to identify ecological corridors in megacities [J].
Dong, Jianquan ;
Peng, Jian ;
Liu, Yanxu ;
Qiu, Sijing ;
Han, Yinan .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2020, 199
[8]   Connecting the dots: mapping habitat connectivity for tigers in central India [J].
Dutta, Trishna ;
Sharma, Sandeep ;
McRae, Brad H. ;
Roy, Parth Sarathi ;
DeFries, Ruth .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 :53-67
[9]   An empirical evaluation of the African elephant as a focal species for connectivity planning in East Africa [J].
Epps, Clinton W. ;
Mutayoba, Benezeth M. ;
Gwin, Lauren ;
Brashares, Justin S. .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2011, 17 (04) :603-612
[10]   Roads to ruin: conservation threats to a sentinel species across an urban gradient [J].
Feist, Blake E. ;
Buhle, Eric R. ;
Baldwin, David H. ;
Spromberg, Julann A. ;
Damm, Steven E. ;
Davis, Jay W. ;
Scholz, Nathaniel L. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (08) :2382-2396