A new method for evaluating the sustainability of bridges

被引:11
作者
Arya, Chanakya [1 ]
Amiri, Ali [1 ]
Vassie, Perry [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
关键词
bridges; design methods & aids; sustainability; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS SUSAIP; CONSTRUCTION; APPRAISAL; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1680/stbu.14.00069
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Civil infrastructure projects such as bridges can have a major impact on many of the issues relevant to sustainability and it is therefore important that civil and structural engineers have methods at their disposal that will help them deliver sustainable designs. This paper describes a new model for appraising the sustainability of bridges. The indictors used to assess sustainability are climate change, resource use, waste, biodiversity and heritage, noise, dust, vibration, aesthetics, employment and businesses, construction costs, maintenance costs and user delay costs. The paper describes the aim of each indicator and provides details of the methods of measurement. The paper also presents the results of a case study on the appraisal of three alternative designs of an over-bridge for a dual two-lane motorway to discover which option is the most sustainable. Details of the key input parameters are provided. The way in which individual impacts are combined to produce an overall sustainability score for a given structure is highlighted. The paper concludes with a discussion on interpreting the results and ways of further improving the sustainability of the selected design.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 453
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Sustainability indicators as a communicative tool: Building bridges in Pennsylvania [J].
Beratan, KK ;
Kabala, SJ ;
Loveless, SM ;
Martin, PJS ;
Spyke, NP .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 94 (1-3) :179-191
[22]   Evaluating the sustainability of Chinese cities: Indicators based on a new data envelopment analysis model [J].
Liu, Xiaohong ;
Liu, Yi ;
Wang, Baohui .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
[23]   A framework for evaluating global policy on sustainability [J].
Lockard, David Winfield .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2015, 6 (02) :215-228
[24]   Evaluating sustainability: Is it necessary, and does it pay? [J].
Green Energy and Technology, 2012, 119 :119-131
[25]   Methods for evaluating the sustainability of green processes [J].
Smith, RL ;
Gonzalez, MA .
EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING - 14, 2004, 18 :1135-1140
[26]   Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment [J].
Pesonen, Hanna-Leena ;
Horn, Susanna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (09) :1780-1792
[27]   Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment [J].
Hanna-Leena Pesonen ;
Susanna Horn .
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 :1780-1792
[28]   The Geocybemetic Assessment Matrix (GAM) - A new assessment tool for evaluating the level and nature of sustainability or unsustainability [J].
Phillips, Jason .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 56 :88-101
[29]   Phytosociometry, a new vision, for evaluating the potential of steppe rangelands and the sustainability of extensive sheep farming systems [J].
Bouyahia, Hadj ;
Benabdeli, Kheloufi ;
Mahammadi, Mohammed ;
Youcefi, Mohammed Toufik .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 15 (04) :617-621
[30]   Sustainability of timber bridges-the magic triangle directional drawings-maintenance costs-lifetime [J].
Gerold, M. .
ISISS '2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, :92-101