Procedure for Selecting Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Kibira, Deogratias [1 ]
Brundage, Michael [2 ]
Feng, Shaw [2 ]
Morris, K. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Morgan State Univ, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA
[2] NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 12TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2017, VOL 4 | 2017年
关键词
KPI Criteria; Value Function; KPI Selection; Sustainable Manufacturing; SYSTEMS; CATEGORIZATION; IMPROVEMENT; METRICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The need for an open, inclusive, and neutral procedure in selecting key performance indicators (KPIs) for sustainable manufacturing has been increasing. The reason is that manufacturers seek to determine what to measure in order to improve environmental sustainability of their products and manufacturing processes. A difficulty arises in understanding and selecting specific indicators from a large number of standalone indicator sets available. This paper presents a procedure for individual manufacturers to select KPIs for measuring, monitoring and " improving environmental aspects of manufacturing processes. The procedure is the basis for a guideline, being proposed for standardization within ASTM International. That guide can be used for (1) identifying candidate KPIs from existing sources, (2) defining new candidate KPIs, (3) selecting appropriate KPIs based on KPI criteria, and (4) composing the selected KPIs with assigned weights into a set. The paper explains how the developed procedure complements existing indicator sets and sustainability-measurement approaches at the manufacturing process level.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Bottom-Up Methodology for Identifying Key Performance Indicators for Sustainability Monitoring of Unit Manufacturing Processes
    Glisic, Marija
    Veluri, Badrinath
    Ramanujan, Devarajan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [22] Selecting Key Resilience Indicators for Indigenous Community Using Fuzzy Delphi Method
    Tseng, Yung-Ping
    Huang, Yu-Chin
    Li, Mei-Syuan
    Jiang, You-Zih
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [23] Key Performance Indicators für Software as a ServiceKey Performance Indicators of Software as a Service
    Raoul Könsgen
    Mario Schaarschmidt
    HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2016, 53 (5) : 662 - 673
  • [24] Selection and Optimization Model of Key Performance Indicators
    Purevsuren, Nyamsuren
    Dashdorj, Zolzaya
    Khujuu, Tamir
    Norinpel, Erdenekhuu
    2020 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICACT): DIGITAL SECURITY GLOBAL AGENDA FOR SAFE SOCIETY!, 2020, : 190 - 196
  • [25] A Review on Key Performance Indicators for Climate Change
    Schokker, Jelise
    Kamilaris, Andreas
    Karatsiolis, Savvas
    ADVANCES AND NEW TRENDS IN ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS: A BOGEYMAN OR SAVIOUR FOR THE UN SUSTAINABILITY GOALS?, 2022, : 273 - 292
  • [26] A methodology for energy key performance indicators analysis
    Faria P.
    Lezama F.
    Vale Z.
    Khorram M.
    Energy Informatics, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [27] Reducing data requirements when selecting key performance indicators for supply chain management: The case of a multinational automotive component manufacturer
    Brint, Andrew
    Genovese, Andrea
    Piccolo, Carmela
    Taboada-Perez, Gerardo J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 233 (233)
  • [28] Sustainable Value Stream Mapping (Sus-VSM): methodology to visualize and assess manufacturing sustainability performance
    Faulkner, William
    Badurdeen, Fazleena
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 85 : 8 - 18
  • [29] A framework for selecting and assessing soil quality indicators for sustainable soil management in waste dumps
    Li, Yue
    Zhao, Hongbao
    Liu, Jiashun
    Chen, Chaonan
    Guo, Yuxuan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [30] Performance profiling of solid lubricant for eco-friendly sustainable manufacturing
    Agarwal, Vaibhav
    Agarwal, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2021, 64 : 294 - 305