A comparative study of the direct boundary element method and the dual reciprocity boundary element method in solving the Helmholtz equation

被引:4
|
作者
Zhu, Song-Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Yinglong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Math & Appl Stat, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OGI Sch Sci & Engn, Dept Environm & Biomol Syst, Beaverton, OR 97006 USA
来源
ANZIAM JOURNAL | 2007年 / 49卷
关键词
the dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM); Helmholtz equation; irregular frequencies;
D O I
10.1017/S1446181100012724
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this paper, we compare the, direct boundary element method (BEM) and the dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) for solving the direct interior Helmholtz problem, in terms of their numerical accuracy and efficiency, as well as their applicability and reliability in the frequency domain. For BEM formulation, there are two possible choices for fundamental solutions, which can lead to quite different conclusions in terms of their reliability in the frequency domain. For DRBEM formulation, it is shown that although the DBREM can correctly predict eigenfrequencies even for higher modes, it fails to yield a reasonably accurate numerical solution for the problem when the frequency is higher than the first eigenfrequency.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 150
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条