Envirodevonomics: A Research Agenda for an Emerging Field

被引:173
作者
Greenstone, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Jack, B. Kelsey [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA USA
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; INFANT-MORTALITY; AIR-POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; WATER-QUALITY; COSTA-RICA; HEALTH; CHINA; LIFE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1257/jel.53.1.5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental quality in many developing countries is poor and generates substantial health and productivity costs. However, the few existing measures of marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for environmental quality improvements indicate low valuations by affected households. This paper argues that this seeming paradox is the central puzzle at the intersection of environmental and development economics: Given poor environmental quality and high health burdens in developing countries, why is MWTP seemingly so low? We develop a conceptual framework for understanding this puzzle and propose four potential explanations for why environmental quality is so poor: (1) due to low income levels, individuals value increases in income more than marginal improvements in environmental quality; (2) the marginal costs of environmental quality improvements are high; (3) political economy factors undermine efficient policymaking; and (4) market failures such as weak property rights and missing capital markets distort MWTP for environmental quality. We review the literature on each explanation and discuss how the framework applies to climate change, which is perhaps the most important issue at the intersection of environment and development economics. The paper concludes with a list of promising and unanswered research questions for the emerging sub-field of "envirodevonomics."
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 42
页数:38
相关论文
共 160 条
[21]   Information and subsidies: Complements or substitutes? [J].
Ashraf, Nava ;
Jack, B. Kelsey ;
Kamenica, Emir .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2013, 88 :133-139
[22]   Can Higher Prices Stimulate Product Use? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Zambia [J].
Ashraf, Nava ;
Berry, James ;
Shapiro, Jesse M. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (05) :2383-2413
[23]  
Assuncao J., 2013, CREDIT AFFECT DEFORE
[24]  
Banerjee A., 2010, NBER WORKING PAPERS
[25]  
Barbier EdwardB., 2007, Natural Resources and Economic Development
[26]   Decentralization of governance and development [J].
Bardhan, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (04) :185-205
[27]  
Bardhan Pranab., 1999, Development Microeconomics
[28]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, The theory of environmental policy, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[29]   On the Economics of Climate Policy [J].
Becker, Gary S. ;
Murphy, Kevin M. ;
Topel, Robert H. .
B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2010, 10 (02)
[30]   Impact of a randomized controlled trial in arsenic risk communication on household water-source choices in Bangladesh [J].
Bennear, Lori ;
Tarozzi, Alessandro ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Balasubramanya, Soumya ;
Ahmed, Kazi Matin ;
van Geen, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 (02) :225-240