Atmospheric predictability at synoptic versus cloud-resolving scales

被引:158
作者
Hohenegger, Cathy [1 ]
Schaer, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-88-11-1783
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The limited atmospheric predictability has been addressed by the development of ensemble prediction systems (EPS) that are now routinely applied for medium-range synoptic-scale numerical weather prediction (NWP). With the increase of computational power, interest is growing in the design of high-resolution (cloud resolving) NWP models and their associated short-range EPS. This development raises a series of fundamental questions, espe cially concerning the type of error growth and the validity of the tangent-linear approximation. To address these issues, a comparison between perturbed medium-range (10 day) synoptic-scale integrations (taken from the operational ECMWF EPS with a horizontal resolution of about 80 km) and short-range (1 day) high-resolution simulations (based on the Lokal Modell of the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling with a grid spacing of 2.2 km) is conducted. The differences between the two systems are interpreted in a nondimensional sense and illustrated with the help of the Lorenz attractor. Typical asymptotic perturbation-doubling times of cloud-resolving and synoptic-scale simulations amount to about 4 and 40 h, respectively, and are primarily related to convective and baro- clinic instability. Thus, in terms of growth rates, integrating a 1-day :1 Cloud- re solving forecast may be seen as equivalent to performing a 10-day synoptic-scale simulation. However, analysis of the prevailing linearity reveals that the two systems are fundamentally different in the following sense: the tangent-linear approximation breaks down at 1. 5 h for cloud resolving against 54 h for synoptic-scale forecasts. In terms of nonlinearity, a 10-day synoptic-scale integration thus corresponds to a very short cloud-resolving simulation of merely;about 7 h. The higher degree of nonlinearity raises questions concerning the direct application of standard synoptic-scale forecasting methodologies (e.g., optimal perturbations, 4D variational data assimilation, or targeted observations) to 1-day cloud-resolving forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1783 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
[41]   PREDICTABILITY OF A FLOW WHICH POSSESSES MANY SCALES OF MOTION [J].
LORENZ, EN .
TELLUS, 1969, 21 (03) :289-&
[42]  
LORENZ EN, 1963, J ATMOS SCI, V20, P130, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO
[43]  
2
[44]   A strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction. II: Limited-area experiments in four Alpine flood events [J].
Marsigli, C ;
Montani, A ;
Nerozzi, F ;
Paccagnella, T ;
Tibaldi, S ;
Molteni, F ;
Buizza, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 127 (576) :2095-2115
[45]  
Mass CF, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P407, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0407:DIHRPM>2.3.CO
[46]  
2
[47]  
MOLTENI F, 1993, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V119, P269, DOI 10.1002/qj.49711951004
[48]   The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation [J].
Molteni, F ;
Buizza, R ;
Palmer, TN ;
Petroliagis, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 122 (529) :73-119
[49]   ENSEMBLE PREDICTION USING DYNAMICALLY CONDITIONED PERTURBATIONS [J].
MUREAU, R ;
MOLTENI, F ;
PALMER, TN .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1993, 119 (510) :299-323
[50]   Multi-model multi-analysis ensembles in quasi-operational medium-range forecasting [J].
Mylne, KR ;
Evans, RE ;
Clark, RT .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 128 (579) :361-384