Atmospheric predictability at synoptic versus cloud-resolving scales

被引:145
作者
Hohenegger, Cathy [1 ]
Schaer, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-88-11-1783
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The limited atmospheric predictability has been addressed by the development of ensemble prediction systems (EPS) that are now routinely applied for medium-range synoptic-scale numerical weather prediction (NWP). With the increase of computational power, interest is growing in the design of high-resolution (cloud resolving) NWP models and their associated short-range EPS. This development raises a series of fundamental questions, espe cially concerning the type of error growth and the validity of the tangent-linear approximation. To address these issues, a comparison between perturbed medium-range (10 day) synoptic-scale integrations (taken from the operational ECMWF EPS with a horizontal resolution of about 80 km) and short-range (1 day) high-resolution simulations (based on the Lokal Modell of the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling with a grid spacing of 2.2 km) is conducted. The differences between the two systems are interpreted in a nondimensional sense and illustrated with the help of the Lorenz attractor. Typical asymptotic perturbation-doubling times of cloud-resolving and synoptic-scale simulations amount to about 4 and 40 h, respectively, and are primarily related to convective and baro- clinic instability. Thus, in terms of growth rates, integrating a 1-day :1 Cloud- re solving forecast may be seen as equivalent to performing a 10-day synoptic-scale simulation. However, analysis of the prevailing linearity reveals that the two systems are fundamentally different in the following sense: the tangent-linear approximation breaks down at 1. 5 h for cloud resolving against 54 h for synoptic-scale forecasts. In terms of nonlinearity, a 10-day synoptic-scale integration thus corresponds to a very short cloud-resolving simulation of merely;about 7 h. The higher degree of nonlinearity raises questions concerning the direct application of standard synoptic-scale forecasting methodologies (e.g., optimal perturbations, 4D variational data assimilation, or targeted observations) to 1-day cloud-resolving forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1783 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] ANCELL BC, 1966, MON WEA REV, V134, P2971
  • [2] Hydrological and meteorological aspects of floods in the Alps: an overview
    Bacchi, B
    Ranzi, R
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (06) : 784 - 798
  • [3] Hydrometeorological aspects of the Real-Time Ultrafinescale Forecast Support during the Special Observing Period of the MAP
    Benoit, R
    Kouwen, N
    Yu, W
    Chamberland, S
    Pellerin, P
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (06) : 877 - 889
  • [4] Benoit R, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P85, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0085:TRTUFS>2.3.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] Bishop CH, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P1748, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1748:ETAAO>2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Bougeault P, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P433, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0433:TMSOP>2.3.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System
    Buizza, R
    Miller, M
    Palmer, TN
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 125 (560) : 2887 - 2908