Power Dynamics and Corporate Power in Governance Processes: Evidence From US Environmental Governance Systems

被引:8
作者
Ba, Yuhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore 259772, Singapore
关键词
power; social media analysis; discourse analysis; corporate involvement; non-state environmental governance; SOCIAL MEDIA USE; COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE; DISCURSIVE POWER; POLICY CHANGE; STATE; LEGITIMACY; POLITICS; SUSTAINABILITY; INSTITUTIONS; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1177/02750740211055221
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Prior research has documented involvement of government and civil society actors in governance processes, but has largely neglected a key player: corporate business interests. Combining insights from social-ecological systems, organizational systems theory, theories of governance and power, interest group rule-making participation, and non-state alternative environmental governance, we examine corporate involvement and power in environmental governance systems. Drawing on a sample of Twitter messages about fuel economy standards, posted between 2012 and 2020, we offer a sector-level discourse analysis of corporate power and its interaction with the sociopolitical environment. The results suggest that business interests are gaining increasing power in the participation arena of U.S. fuel economy governance processes. The results likewise indicate corporations' response to a changing political landscape in the U.S. Taken together, our analysis advances current scholarship on power dynamics in governance processes and on empirical assessment of power, offering implications for governance system design and implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 220
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Brokering Power: Bureaucratic Contestations in Participatory Forest Governance [J].
Kutty, Roshni ;
Menon, Ajit .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2025, 23 (02) :41-51
[12]   Multilevel governance in climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: structure, processes, and power dynamics [J].
Ishtiaque, Asif ;
Eakin, Hallie ;
Vij, Sumit ;
Chhetri, Netra ;
Rahman, Feisal ;
Huq, Saleemul .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2021, 21 (03)
[13]   Public governance versus corporate governance: Evidence from oil drilling in forests [J].
Cust, James ;
Harding, Torfinn ;
Krings, Hanna ;
Rivera-Ballesteros, Alexis .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2023, 163
[14]   Corporate governance and emission performance: Malaysian evidence on the moderating role of environmental innovation [J].
Hamoudah, Manal Mohammed ;
Banhmeid, Badr ;
Alahdal, Waleed M. ;
Sahu, Muskan .
DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (01)
[15]   Corporate governance systems as dynamic institutions: Towards a dynamic model of corporate governance systems [J].
Emenalo, Chukwunonye O. .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 6 (01) :39-49
[16]   Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance [J].
Latridis, George Emmanuel .
EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2013, 14 :55-75
[17]   Corporate governance, external control, and environmental information transparency: Evidence from emerging markets [J].
Jacoby, Gady ;
Liu, Mingzhi ;
Wang, Yefeng ;
Wu, Zhenyu ;
Zhang, Ying .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2019, 58 :269-283
[18]   Corporate Governance, Integrated Reporting and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from the South African Context [J].
Corvino, Antonio ;
Doni, Federica ;
Martini, Silvio Bianchi .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
[19]   The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting on corporate profitability: evidence from Thailand [J].
Treepongkaruna, Sirimon ;
Suttipun, Muttanachai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2024,
[20]   ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN ASEAN: A THRESHOLD EFFECTS OF CORPORATE STRATEGY [J].
Wahab, Siti Nur Aqilah Ab ;
Azman, Nik Hadiyan Nik ;
Ahmad, Zamri .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2024, 25 (02) :660-695