Inter-zonal tradable discharge permit system to control water pollution in Tianjin, China

被引:14
作者
Cao, HB [1 ]
Ikeda, S
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Minist Educ China, Coll Resources Sci & Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Policy & Planning Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050006, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es0490119
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, Chinese environmental authorities have expressed interest in the use of Tradable Discharge Permits (TDP) as a regulatory instrument to control pollutant emissions. Environmental professionals still have not had enough experience, however, in designing and managing TOP systems, especially for non-uniformly dispersed pollutants. As an empirical study,this paper proposes an interzonal TOP system and analyzes its effectiveness in cost savings and environmental protection for reducing water pollutant COD (chemical oxygen demand) in Tianjin, China. Zonal permit system (ZPS) and emission permit system (EPS) are discussed for comparison. The inter-zonal TOP system is demonstrated to improve cost efficiency by allowing permit trades between zones, as long as water quality constraints are satisfied. The transactions are assumed to proceed in a multilateral sequential way and are simulated with a circularly running linear programming (LP) model. The simulation of permit transactions among 20 firms shows that to reach the same COD removal target, ZPS, interzonal TDP system, and EPS lowered the total reduction cost by 12.8%, 14.6%, and 15.8%, respectively. EPS, however, brought about "hot spots" problem. Finally, the transaction costs and the sensitivity of the three TOP systems to changes in both COD reduction rate and the initial permit allocation are discussed, and policy implications are addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:4692 / 4699
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   MARKET FAILURE IN INCENTIVE-BASED REGULATION - THE CASE OF EMISSIONS TRADING [J].
ATKINSON, S ;
TIETENBERG, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1991, 21 (01) :17-31
[2]   Improving efficiency in bilateral emission trading [J].
Burtraw, D ;
Harrison, KW ;
Turner, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (01) :19-33
[3]  
CHADDERTON RA, 1981, WATER RESOUR BULL, V17, P760
[4]  
CHENG ST, 1990, ENV SYSTEM ANAL, P62
[5]  
*CHIN EM TRAD, PIL PROGR
[6]   Efficiency gains under exchange-rate emission trading [J].
Forsund, FR ;
Nævdal, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 12 (04) :403-423
[8]  
HAHN RW, 1989, ECOL LAW QUART, V16, P361
[9]  
Jahiel A.R., 1998, Managing the Chinese Environment, P33
[10]  
KLAASSEN G, 1996, ACID RAIN ENV DEGRAD, pCH3