共 50 条
Canopy Fluorescence Sensing for In-Season Maize Nitrogen Status Diagnosis
被引:12
作者:
Dong, Rui
[1
]
Miao, Yuxin
[2
]
Wang, Xinbing
[3
]
Yuan, Fei
[4
]
Kusnierek, Krzysztof
[5
]
机构:
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Soil Water & Climate, Precis Agr Ctr, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Crop Sci, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Minnesota State Univ, Dept Geog, Mankato, MN 56001 USA
[5] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res NIBIO, Ctr Precis Agr, Nylinna 226, N-2849 Kapp, Norway
基金:
美国食品与农业研究所;
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词:
fluorescence sensing;
nitrogen status;
multiple linear regression;
machine learning;
precision nitrogen management;
NUTRITION INDEX;
NONDESTRUCTIVE ESTIMATION;
CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE;
FLAVONOIDS;
REFLECTANCE;
ALGORITHMS;
RETRIEVAL;
SATELLITE;
RADIATION;
SENSORS;
D O I:
10.3390/rs13245141
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Accurate assessment of crop nitrogen (N) status and understanding the N demand are considered essential in precision N management. Chlorophyll fluorescence is unsusceptible to confounding signals from underlying bare soil and is closely related to plant photosynthetic activity. Therefore, fluorescence sensing is considered a promising technology for monitoring crop N status, even at an early growth stage. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential of using Multiplex(R) 3, a proximal canopy fluorescence sensor, to detect N status variability and to quantitatively estimate N status indicators at four key growth stages of maize. The sensor measurements were performed at different growth stages, and three different regression methods were compared to estimate plant N concentration (PNC), plant N uptake (PNU), and N nutrition index (NNI). The results indicated that the induced differences in maize plant N status were detectable as early as the V6 growth stage. The first method based on simple regression (SR) and the Multiplex sensor indices normalized by growing degree days (GDD) or N sufficiency index (NSI) achieved acceptable estimation accuracy (R-2 = 0.73-0.87), showing a good potential of canopy fluorescence sensing for N status estimation. The second method using multiple linear regression (MLR), fluorescence indices and GDDs had the lowest modeling accuracy (R-2 = 0.46-0.79). The third tested method used a non-linear regression approach in the form of random forest regression (RFR) based on multiple sensor indices and GDDs. This approach achieved the best estimation accuracy (R-2 = 0.84-0.93) and the most accurate diagnostic result.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文