Canopy Fluorescence Sensing for In-Season Maize Nitrogen Status Diagnosis

被引:11
|
作者
Dong, Rui [1 ]
Miao, Yuxin [2 ]
Wang, Xinbing [3 ]
Yuan, Fei [4 ]
Kusnierek, Krzysztof [5 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Soil Water & Climate, Precis Agr Ctr, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Crop Sci, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Minnesota State Univ, Dept Geog, Mankato, MN 56001 USA
[5] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res NIBIO, Ctr Precis Agr, Nylinna 226, N-2849 Kapp, Norway
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
fluorescence sensing; nitrogen status; multiple linear regression; machine learning; precision nitrogen management; NUTRITION INDEX; NONDESTRUCTIVE ESTIMATION; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; FLAVONOIDS; REFLECTANCE; ALGORITHMS; RETRIEVAL; SATELLITE; RADIATION; SENSORS;
D O I
10.3390/rs13245141
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of crop nitrogen (N) status and understanding the N demand are considered essential in precision N management. Chlorophyll fluorescence is unsusceptible to confounding signals from underlying bare soil and is closely related to plant photosynthetic activity. Therefore, fluorescence sensing is considered a promising technology for monitoring crop N status, even at an early growth stage. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential of using Multiplex(R) 3, a proximal canopy fluorescence sensor, to detect N status variability and to quantitatively estimate N status indicators at four key growth stages of maize. The sensor measurements were performed at different growth stages, and three different regression methods were compared to estimate plant N concentration (PNC), plant N uptake (PNU), and N nutrition index (NNI). The results indicated that the induced differences in maize plant N status were detectable as early as the V6 growth stage. The first method based on simple regression (SR) and the Multiplex sensor indices normalized by growing degree days (GDD) or N sufficiency index (NSI) achieved acceptable estimation accuracy (R-2 = 0.73-0.87), showing a good potential of canopy fluorescence sensing for N status estimation. The second method using multiple linear regression (MLR), fluorescence indices and GDDs had the lowest modeling accuracy (R-2 = 0.46-0.79). The third tested method used a non-linear regression approach in the form of random forest regression (RFR) based on multiple sensor indices and GDDs. This approach achieved the best estimation accuracy (R-2 = 0.84-0.93) and the most accurate diagnostic result.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of optical sensor for in-season nitrogen management and grain yield prediction in maize
    Baral, Bandhu Raj
    Adhikari, Parbati
    JOURNAL OF MAIZE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 1 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [32] Water effects on optical canopy sensing for late-season site-specific nitrogen management of maize
    Lo, Tsz Him
    Rudnick, Daran R.
    Krienke, Brian T.
    Heeren, Derek M.
    Ge, Yufeng
    Shaver, Tim M.
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 162 : 154 - 164
  • [33] In-Season Diagnosis of Winter Wheat Nitrogen Status in Smallholder Farmer Fields Across a Village Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Remote Sensing
    Chen, Zhichao
    Miao, Yuxin
    Lu, Junjun
    Zhou, Lan
    Li, Yue
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Lou, Weidong
    Zhang, Zheng
    Kusnierek, Krzysztof
    Liu, Changhua
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [34] In-Season Optical Sensing Improves Nitrogen-Use Efficiency for Winter Wheat
    Li, F.
    Miao, Y.
    Zhang, F.
    Cui, Z.
    Li, R.
    Chen, X.
    Zhang, H.
    Schroder, J.
    Raun, W. R.
    Jia, L.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (05) : 1566 - 1574
  • [35] Predicting Nitrogen Efficiencies in Mature Maize with Parametric Models Employing In-Season Hyperspectral Imaging
    Olson, Monica B.
    Crawford, Melba M.
    Vyn, Tony J.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [36] Responsive in-season nitrogen management for cereals
    Shanahan, J. F.
    Kitchen, N. R.
    Raun, W. R.
    Schepers, J. S.
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2008, 61 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [37] In-Season Prediction of Sugarbeet Yield, Quality, and Nitrogen Status Using an Active Sensor
    Gehl, Ronald J.
    Boring, Timothy J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (04) : 1012 - 1018
  • [38] Effects of Various Preplant and In-Season Nitrogen Management Practices for Potatoes on Plant and Soil Nitrogen Status
    Alva, A. K.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2009, 40 (1-6) : 649 - 659
  • [39] In-Season Potato Crop Nitrogen Status Assessment from Satellite and Meteorological Data
    D. Goffart
    F. Ben Abdallah
    Y. Curnel
    V. Planchon
    P. Defourny
    J.-P. Goffart
    Potato Research, 2022, 65 : 729 - 755
  • [40] In-Season Potato Crop Nitrogen Status Assessment from Satellite and Meteorological Data
    Goffart, D.
    Ben Abdallah, F.
    Curnel, Y.
    Planchon, V
    Defourny, P.
    Goffart, J-P
    POTATO RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (03) : 729 - 755