Damage-based seismic reliability concept for woodframe structures

被引:27
|
作者
van de Lindt, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2005年 / 131卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(668)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the United States the majority of modern residential and a portion of commercial structures are woodframe construction which typically consists of dimension lumber sheathed with 1.22 x 2.44 m (4 x 8 ft) OSB or plywood panels. This paper presents the results of a study on the development of a damage-based seismic reliability model for light-frame wood structures subject to earthquake load. It is presented in conceptual form with a simple example for a symmetric one-story woodframe building. The concept presented here provides the basic methodology to calibrate a seismic damage model and compute the structural reliability using a damage-based limit state function. The illustrative example necessitated a small experimental program and the use of existing software. The mechanistic damage model chosen for the example expresses damage as a linear combination of the maximum displacement during an earthquake simulation and the hysteretic energy dissipated by each shearwall within a structure. In order to make the model mechanistic, it was regressively calibrated based on the results of static and dynamic tests conducted on 2.44 x 2.44 m (8 x 8 ft) wood shearwalls. The fastener spacing on the perimeter of the shearwall sheathing panels was chosen as the design variable of interest, hence all damage model parameters were developed as a function of their spacing. Following calibration, a damaged-based limit state for reliability analysis is developed that enables one to calculate the structural reliability index provided against a prescribed damage level. The result for an example limit state is presented and compared to Federal Emergency Management Agency transient drift performance specifications for collapse prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Component damage-based seismic fragility analysis of high-rise building with transfer structure
    Liang, Kun
    Su, Ray Kai Leung
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2022, 31 (18):
  • [32] A note on damage-based inelastic spectra
    Basu, B
    Gupta, VK
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1996, 25 (05): : 421 - 433
  • [33] Damage-based strength reduction factor spectra of structures subjected to bidirectional ground motions
    Wang, Feng
    Li, H. N.
    Zhang, C. Q.
    Zhang, Y. Z.
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (01) : 72 - 88
  • [34] Damage-Based Design Earthquake Loads for Single-Degree-Of-Freedom Inelastic Structures
    Moustafa, Abbas
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 137 (03) : 456 - 467
  • [35] A damage-based definition of effective peak acceleration
    Basu, B
    Gupta, VK
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1998, 27 (05): : 503 - 512
  • [36] Damage-based assessment and optimization for seismic residual strength of single-layer spherical reticulated domes
    Zhang T.-L.
    Ding Y.
    Li Z.-X.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36 : 131 - 137
  • [37] Interlayer area damage modeling and damage-based seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridge and track system
    Wen, Tianxing
    Jiang, Lizhong
    Jiang, Liqiang
    Zhou, Wangbao
    Du, Yanliang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 272
  • [38] Interlayer area damage modeling and damage-based seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridge and track system
    Wen, Tianxing
    Jiang, Lizhong
    Jiang, Liqiang
    Zhou, Wangbao
    Du, Yanliang
    Engineering Structures, 2022, 272
  • [39] Fragility relationships for populations of woodframe structures based on inelastic response
    Gencturk, Bora
    Elnashai, Amr S.
    Song, Junho
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 12 : 119 - 128
  • [40] Seismic reliability analysis of structures
    Cornell, C. Allin
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (13): : 1811 - 1812