The influence of item composition on RAN letter performance in first-grade children

被引:35
作者
Compton, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Peabody Coll, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/00224669030370020301
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether changing the letter composition of the Denckla and Rudel (1976) RAN task influenced task performance (speed and accuracy) and the RAN-word identification skill relationship in first-grade children. To accomplish this, 383 first-grade children were administered four different RAN tasks in October, and performance on these measures was used to predict word identification skill in April. The various RAN tasks consisted of the Denckla and Rudel RAN letter-naming task and three alternative RAN tasks constructed by making a letter substitution that replaced the letter o within the Denckla and Rudel letter matrix (a, d, o, p, s) with another letter. The three alternative RAN tasks were designed to increase visual confusion (q for o), phonological confusion (v for o), or the combination of visual and phonological confusion (b for o). The results suggest that (a) substituting a letter that was visually similar to other letters within the Denckla and Rudel letter matrix had the greatest influence on RAN speed and accuracy performance, (b) substitutions that increased the phonological similarity of letters in the matrix predicted more unique variance in future word identification skill, (c) RAN accuracy performance as a predictor of future word identification skill provided little unique variance beyond that associated with R AN speed performance, and (d) RAN predicted significant variance in future word identification skill beyond that associated with the autoregressor in children who were at the earliest stages of reading development.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 94
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES, CONFRONTATIONAL NAMING, AND IMMEDIATE MEMORY IN DYSLEXIA [J].
ACKERMAN, PT ;
DYKMAN, RA .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1993, 26 (09) :597-609
[2]  
Adams M.J., 1990, Beginning to Read
[3]   PRIMING AND RESPONSE SELECTION PROCESSES IN LETTER CLASSIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION TASKS [J].
ARGUIN, M ;
BUB, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (05) :1199-1219
[4]   PHONEMIC AWARENESS, NAMING, VISUAL SYMBOL PROCESSING, AND READING [J].
BADIAN, NA .
READING AND WRITING, 1993, 5 (01) :87-100
[5]   DO DYSLEXIC AND OTHER POOR READERS DIFFER IN READING-RELATED COGNITIVE SKILLS [J].
BADIAN, NA .
READING AND WRITING, 1994, 6 (01) :45-63
[7]  
Berninger V., 2001, Scientific Studies in Reading, V5, P59, DOI [10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_3, DOI 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_3]
[9]   COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF IQ CONTROL METHODS ON MEMORY AND NAMING SPEED PREDICTORS OF READING-DISABILITY [J].
BOWERS, PG ;
STEFFY, R ;
TATE, E .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1988, 23 (03) :304-319
[10]   TRACING SYMBOL NAMING SPEEDS UNIQUE CONTRIBUTIONS TO READING DISABILITIES OVER TIME [J].
BOWERS, PG .
READING AND WRITING, 1995, 7 (02) :189-216