A Comparison of Physical Activity Between Home-Based and Centre-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomised Controlled Secondary Analysis

被引:6
作者
Horton, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Ruksenaite, Justina [2 ]
Mitchell, Katy [3 ]
Sewell, Louise [1 ]
Newby, Christopher [4 ]
Singh, Sally J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Sch Life Sci, Coventry, England
[2] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Dept Resp Med, Leicester, England
[3] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Ctr Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Leicester, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES | 2021年 / 2卷
关键词
pulmonary rehabilitation; physical activity; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); exercise; step count; sedentary time; COPD; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; DISEASE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3389/fresc.2021.743441
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a highly effective intervention for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Physical activity (PA) has been shown to increase after a centre-based programme, yet it is not clear if a home-based programme can offer the same benefit. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of home-based PR compared with the centre-based PR on the PA levels post 7 weeks of PR and 6 months follow-up. Method: In this study, 51 participants with COPD, of them, 36 (71%) men completed physical activity monitoring with a SenseWear Armband, at three time points (baseline, 7 weeks, and 6 months). The participants were randomly assigned to either centre-based supervised PR (n = 25; 69 +/- 6 years; FEV1 55 +/- 20% predicted) or home-based PR (n = 26; 68 +/- 7 years; FEV1 42 +/- 19% predicted) programmes lasting 7 weeks. The home-based programme includes one hospital visit, a self-management manual, and two telephone calls. The PA was measured as step count, time in moderate PA (3-6 metabolic equivalent of tasks [METs]) in bouts of more than 10min and sedentary time (<2 METs). Results: Home-based PR increased step count significantlymore than the centre-based PR after 7 weeks (mean difference 1,463 steps: 95% CI 280-2,645, p = 0.02). There was no difference in time spent in moderate PA was observed (mean difference 62 min: 95% CI -56 to 248, p = 0.24). Sedentary behaviour was also significantly different between the centre and home-based groups. The home group spent 52min less time sedentary compared with the centre-based (CI -106 to 2, p = 0.039). However, after 6 months, the step count and time spent in moderate PA returned to baseline in both the groups. Conclusion: This study provides an important insight into the role of home-based PR which has the potential to be offered as an alternative to the centre-based PR. Understanding who may best respond from the centre or home-based PR warrants further exploration and how to maintain these initial benefits for the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Not All Home-based Exercise Programs Are Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs Reply [J].
Bhatt, Surya P. ;
Dransfield, Mark T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 200 (11) :1443-1444
[42]   Randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical activity intervention in breast cancer survivors [J].
Ian M. Lahart ;
George S. Metsios ;
Alan M. Nevill ;
George D. Kitas ;
Amtul R. Carmichael .
BMC Cancer, 16
[43]   Outcomes of community-based and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for pneumoconiosis patients: a retrospective study [J].
Tsang, Eric W. ;
Kwok, Henry ;
Chan, Aidan K. Y. ;
Choo, Kah Lin ;
Chan, Kin Sang ;
Lau, Kam Shing ;
Chan, Chetwyn C. H. .
BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2018, 18
[44]   A Home-Based Rehabilitation Intervention for Adults Living With HIV: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Cobbing, Saul ;
Hanass-Hancock, Jill ;
Myezwa, Hellen .
JANAC-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF NURSES IN AIDS CARE, 2017, 28 (01) :105-117
[45]   Home-based is as effective as centre-based rehabilitation for improving upper limb motor recovery and activity limitations after stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Nascimento, Lucas R. ;
Gaviorno, Livia Fornaciari ;
Brunelli, Milena de Souza ;
Goncalves, Jessica Vaz ;
da Silva Areas, Fernando Zanela .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (12) :1565-1577
[46]   Understanding Physical Activity During Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation From Multiple Theoretical Perspectives [J].
Blanchard, Chris M. ;
Reid, Robert D. ;
Morrin, Louise I. ;
McDonnell, Lisa ;
McGannon, Kerry ;
Rhodes, Ryan E. ;
Spence, John C. ;
Edwards, Nancy .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2011, 31 (03) :173-180
[47]   Effectiveness of a combined exercise training and home-based walking programme on physical activity compared with standard medical care in moderate COPD: a randomised controlled trial [J].
de Roos, P. ;
Lucas, C. ;
Strijbos, J. H. ;
van Trijffel, E. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2018, 104 (01) :116-121
[48]   Change in physical activity (PA) behavior assessed by accelerometry after home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in COPD [J].
Chambellan, Arnaud ;
Badatcheff, Camille ;
Bellocq, Agnes ;
Costes, Frederic ;
Ouksel, Hakima .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
[49]   The Impact of Patient Preference on Attendance and Completion Rates at Centre-Based and mHealth Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Non-Inferiority Pragmatic Clinical Trial [J].
Candy, Sarah ;
Reeve, Julie ;
Dobson, Rosie ;
Whittaker, Robyn ;
Garrett, Jeffrey ;
Warren, Jim ;
Calder, Amanda ;
Tane, Taria ;
Robertson, Trina ;
Rashid, Usman ;
Taylor, Denise .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2023, 18 :1419-1429
[50]   Effective Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Restrictive Lung Diseases [J].
Kagaya, Hitoshi ;
Takahashi, Hitomi ;
Sugawara, Keiyu ;
Kasai, Chikage ;
Kiyokawa, Noritaka ;
Shioya, Takanobu .
TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 218 (03) :215-219