A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites

被引:12
作者
Li, Jianbing [1 ,2 ]
Rahman, Mohammad Habibur [1 ]
Thring, Ronald Wallen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ No British Columbia, Environm Sci & Engn Program, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
[2] N China Elect Power Univ, China Canada Energy & Environm Res Ctr, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
contaminated site; fuzzy set; MCDA; multi-criteria decision analysis; remediation alternative; stakeholder; uncertainty; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SELECTION; TECHNOLOGIES; NETWORK; AHP;
D O I
10.1504/IJEP.2010.034236
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents an effective Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (FMCDA) approach for contaminated site management. The development was based on selecting eight criteria for remedial alternative evaluation and determining the weight of criteria importance under uncertainty addressing various uncertainty issues in remedial alternative assessment process using a fuzzy-set approach based on the questionnaire survey results evaluating and ranking remedial alternatives by establishing a fuzzy evaluation matrix of remediation alternatives through comprehensively considering different stakeholder opinions and uncertainties within a general decision analysis framework. A case study on the remedial alternative selection for a contaminated site in western Canada is conducted to illustrate the efficiency and applicability of the developed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 239
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Choosing a Logistics Center Location in Turkey
    Surmeli, Gozde
    Kaya, Ihsan
    Erdogan, Melike
    2015 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING, SIMULATION, AND APPLIED OPTIMIZATION (ICMSAO), 2015,
  • [32] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Identify Global and Local Importance Weights of Decision Criteria
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Paradowski, Bartosz
    Shekhovtsov, Andrii
    Salabun, Wojciech
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2023, 22 (06) : 1867 - 1892
  • [33] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [34] Multi-criteria decision analysis of steam reforming for hydrogen production
    Janosovsky, Jan
    Bohacikova, Viktoria
    Kraviarova, Dominika
    Variny, Miroslav
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 263
  • [35] An integrated subsurface modeling and risk assessment approach for managing the petroleum-contaminated sites
    Liu, L
    Huang, GH
    Hao, RX
    Cheng, SY
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 39 (11-12): : 3083 - 3113
  • [36] Multi-criteria Decisional Approach of the OLAP Analysis by Fuzzy Logic: Green Logistics as a Case Study
    Boutkhoum, Omar
    Hanine, Mohamed
    Tikniouine, Abdessadek
    Agouti, Tarik
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 40 (08) : 2345 - 2359
  • [37] DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM BASED ON STOCHASTIC NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION FOR PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SITE MANAGEMENT
    Yang, Qi
    Lu, Hongwei
    He, Li
    Shen, Jing
    Huang, Guo He
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 16 (07): : 1423 - 1434
  • [38] Sustainability assessment of products based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis
    Feng, Chunhua
    Mai, Yunfei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (1-4) : 695 - 710
  • [39] Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
    Wolfslehner, Bernhard
    Seidl, Rupert
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 46 (06) : 850 - 861
  • [40] Multi-criteria decision analysis in urban water asset management
    Carrico, Nelson
    Covas, Didia
    Almeida, Maria do Ceu
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (07) : 558 - 569