A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites

被引:12
|
作者
Li, Jianbing [1 ,2 ]
Rahman, Mohammad Habibur [1 ]
Thring, Ronald Wallen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ No British Columbia, Environm Sci & Engn Program, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
[2] N China Elect Power Univ, China Canada Energy & Environm Res Ctr, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
contaminated site; fuzzy set; MCDA; multi-criteria decision analysis; remediation alternative; stakeholder; uncertainty; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SELECTION; TECHNOLOGIES; NETWORK; AHP;
D O I
10.1504/IJEP.2010.034236
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents an effective Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (FMCDA) approach for contaminated site management. The development was based on selecting eight criteria for remedial alternative evaluation and determining the weight of criteria importance under uncertainty addressing various uncertainty issues in remedial alternative assessment process using a fuzzy-set approach based on the questionnaire survey results evaluating and ranking remedial alternatives by establishing a fuzzy evaluation matrix of remediation alternatives through comprehensively considering different stakeholder opinions and uncertainties within a general decision analysis framework. A case study on the remedial alternative selection for a contaminated site in western Canada is conducted to illustrate the efficiency and applicability of the developed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 239
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [2] An integrated decision support system for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites
    Li, JB
    Huang, GH
    Zeng, GM
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 36 (07): : 1163 - 1186
  • [3] An intelligent decision support system for management of petroleum-contaminated sites
    Geng, JQ
    Chen, Z
    Chan, CW
    Huang, GH
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2001, 20 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [4] Application of a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach for evaluating the sustainability of contaminated site management: An example from China
    Li, Xiaonuo
    Yi, Shiyi
    Chen, Weiping
    Cundy, Andrew B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 104
  • [5] A New Approach to Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Acceptability Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FUZZY SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION AND THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 89 : 947 - 952
  • [6] Sustainable risk management strategy selection using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach
    Edjossan-Sossou, Abla Mimi
    Galvez, Daniel
    Deck, Olivier
    Al Heib, Marwan
    Verdel, Thierry
    Dupont, Laurent
    Chery, Olivier
    Camargo, Mauricio
    Morel, Laure
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 45
  • [7] Use of multi-criteria decision analysis in fuzzy network DEA models
    Pieter, Michal
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2017), 2017, : 566 - 571
  • [8] A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RETAIL LOCATION SELECTION
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    Tuysuz, Fatih
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2013, 12 (04) : 729 - 755
  • [9] Multi-criteria multi-stakeholder decision analysis using a fuzzy-stochastic approach for hydrosystem management
    Subagadis, Yohannes H.
    Schuetze, Niels
    Grundmann, Jens
    EVOLVING WATER RESOURCES SYSTEMS: UNDERSTANDING, PREDICTING AND MANAGING WATER-SOCIETY INTERACTIONS, 2014, 364 : 464 - 469
  • [10] Fuzzy multi-criteria approach for criticality assessment and optimization of decision making
    Chakhrit, Ammar
    Chennoufi, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (02) : 2701 - 2716