Effect of forage species and supplement type on rumen kinetics and serum metabolites in growing beef heifers grazing winter forage

被引:5
|
作者
McFarlane, Z. D. [1 ]
Barbero, R. P. [2 ]
Nave, R. L. G. [3 ]
Maheiros, E. B. [4 ]
Reis, R. A. [5 ]
Mulliniks, J. T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Anim Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] UFRRJ Univ Fed Rural Rio de Janeiro, Inst Zootecnia, Dept Prod Anim, BR-23897 Seropedica, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Plant Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[4] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Ciencias Exatas, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[5] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Zootecnia, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Nebraska, West Cent Res & Extens Ctr, N Platte, NE 69101 USA
关键词
beef heifer; protein supplementation; winter grazing; PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTATION; COOL-SEASON; NITROGEN; CATTLE; WARM; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; COWS; QUALITY; FERMENTATION;
D O I
10.2527/jas2017.1780
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of stockpiled forage type and protein supplementation on VFA production, serum metabolites, and BW in yearling beef heifers. Over 2 yr, spring-born, Angus crossbred yearling beef heifers (n = 42; 305 +/- 2.9 kg initial BW) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 forage pasture types: 1) endophyte-infected tall fescue [TF; Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort], 2) a big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) and indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans L.) combination (BI), or 3) switchgrass (SG; Panicum virgatum L.). Each pasture was then randomly assigned to receive either 1 of 2 isonitrogenous CP treatments: 1) 0.68 kg.heifer(-1).d(-1) of dried distiller's grains with solubles (DDGS; 28% CP and 88% TDN) or 2) 0.22 kg.heifer(-1).d(-1) of blood meal and fish meal (BF; 72.5% CP and 69.5% TDN), resulting in a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Treatments were initiated in January and terminated in April in both years of the study. Body weights and blood samples were collected approximately every 28 d from initiation of grazing until the end of the trial. Heifer BW change from January to February and overall BW change were greater (P < 0.01) for TF heifers. However, BW change from March to April was not different (P = 0.84) among forage types. Supplement type did not influence (P = 0.13) BW or BW change from January to February and from January to April; however, heifers fed DDGS had greater (P = 0.03) BW gain from March to April. Heifer BW change from February to March exhibited (P < 0.05) a forage type x supplement interaction, with BF-fed heifers gaining more BW on BI pastures than DDGS-fed heifers. Serum glucose concentrations, ruminal acetate, and the acetate: propionate ratio were greater (P = 0.04) for SG heifers. However, circulating serum NEFA and urea N (SUN) concentrations were not different (P = 0.85) among forage types. Serum glucose and NEFA concentrations were not influenced (P = 0.61) by supplement type. Circulating SUN concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) in BF-supplemented heifers. Ruminal acetate tended to be greater (P = 0.09) and butyrate concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) for BF-supplemented heifers. The acetate: propionate ratio was not influenced (P = 0.15) by supplement type. These results suggest that a compensatory gain period prior to breeding would be needed for these native warm-season species to be a viable opportunity for growing and developing replacement heifers in the southeastern United States.
引用
收藏
页码:5301 / 5308
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条