Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

被引:23
|
作者
Tsuchida, Kouhei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Mari [1 ]
Tsubouchi, Misako [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro [1 ]
Tsuchida, Chieko [1 ]
Yoshitake, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Takako [1 ]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
来源
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; DIFFICULT; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PLUS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; PANCREATITIS; PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation in patients with recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy
    Tsai, Tzung-Jiun
    Lai, Kwok-Hung
    Lin, Chiun-Ku
    Chan, Hoi-Hung
    Wang, E-Ming
    Tsai, Wei-Lun
    Cheng, Jin-Shiung
    Yu, Hsien-Chung
    Chen, Wen-Chi
    Hsu, Ping-I
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 78 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [22] Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with sphincterotomy for difficult common bile duct stones ≤12 mm: a prospective study
    Velegraki, Magdalini
    Arna, Despoina
    Nikolaou, Pinelopi
    Psistakis, Andreas
    Fragaki, Maria
    Chlouverakis, Gregorios
    Vardas, Emmanouil
    Paspatis, Gregorios
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 37 (01): : 89 - 94
  • [23] Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with and without a prior endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of patients with large and/or multiple common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Pan
    Lin, Huapeng
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Wu, Yu-Shen
    Tang, Maocai
    Lai, Liang
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 : 91 - 101
  • [24] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the management of recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous endoscopic sphincterotomy
    Yoon, Hyung Geun
    Moon, Jong Ho
    Choi, Hyun Jong
    Kim, Dong Choon
    Kang, Myung Soo
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Cha, Sang-Woo
    Cho, Young Deok
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Kim, Sun-Joo
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 26 (02) : 259 - 263
  • [25] Delayed Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation After Sphincterotomy for Removing Large Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Acute Cholangitis
    Lee, Jong Chan
    Moon, Jong Ho
    Choi, Hyun Jong
    Kim, Dong Choon
    Choi, Moon Han
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Cha, Sang-Woo
    Cho, Young Deok
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Kim, Sun-Joo
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (06) : 1302 - 1306
  • [26] Endoscopic papillary balloon intermittent dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones
    Fu, Bai-Qing
    Xu, Ya-Ping
    Tao, Li-Sheng
    Yao, Jun
    Zhou, Chun-Suo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (15) : 2425 - 2432
  • [27] Immediate or Interval Endoscopic Papillary Large-balloon Dilation after Limited Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stone Removal
    Saito, Hirokazu
    Imamura, Haruo
    Matsushita, Ikuo
    Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
    Tada, Shuji
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (17) : 2713 - 2718
  • [28] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Bile Duct Stones
    Abdul Haseeb
    Martin L. Freeman
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2019, 17 (2) : 221 - 230
  • [29] Large balloon dilation post endoscopic sphincterotomy in removal of difficult common bile duct stones: A literature review
    Rouquette, Olivier
    Bommelaer, Gilles
    Abergel, Armando
    Poincloux, Laurent
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (24) : 7760 - 7766
  • [30] Combined endoscopic large balloon dilation with limited sphincterotomy versus sole sphincterotomy for removal of large or multiple common bile duct stones
    Mohammed, Hossam Ibrahim
    Nada, Ali Saad Eldin
    Seddik, Randa Mohamed
    ElGazara, Ahmed Ragab
    EGYPTIAN LIVER JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (01)