Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

被引:24
作者
Tsuchida, Kouhei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Mari [1 ]
Tsubouchi, Misako [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro [1 ]
Tsuchida, Chieko [1 ]
Yoshitake, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Takako [1 ]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; DIFFICULT; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PLUS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; PANCREATITIS; PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Guda, NM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (07) :845-864
[12]  
García-Cano J, 2009, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V101, P541, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082009000800004
[13]   Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones [J].
Heo, Jeung Ho ;
Kang, Dae Hwan ;
Jung, Hyo Jin ;
Kwon, Dae Sik ;
An, Jin Kwang ;
Kim, Bo Suk ;
Suh, Kyung Duk ;
Lee, Sang Yong ;
Lee, Joo Ho ;
Kim, Gwang Ha ;
Kim, Tae Oh ;
Heo, Jeong ;
Song, Geun Am ;
Cho, Mong .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (04) :720-726
[14]   Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Combined With Large Balloon Dilation Can Reduce the Procedure Time and Fluoroscopy Time for Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones [J].
Itoi, Takao ;
Itokawa, Fumihide ;
Sofuni, Atsushi ;
Kurihara, Toshio ;
Tsuchiya, Takayoshi ;
Ishii, Kentaro ;
Tsuji, Shujiro ;
Ikeuchi, Nobuhito ;
Moriyasu, Fuminori .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (03) :560-565
[15]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY OF AMPULLA OF VATER [J].
KAWAI, K ;
AKASAKA, Y ;
MURAKAMI, K ;
TADA, M ;
KOHLI, Y ;
NAKAJIMA, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1974, 20 (04) :148-151
[16]   Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy [J].
Kim, Hyun Gun ;
Cheon, Young Koog ;
Cho, Young Deok ;
Moon, Jong Ho ;
Park, Do Hyun ;
Lee, Tae Hoon ;
Choi, Hyun Jong ;
Park, Sang-Heum ;
Lee, Joon Seong ;
Lee, Moon Sung .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (34) :4298-4304
[17]   Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones [J].
Kim, Jin Hong ;
Yang, Min Jae ;
Hwang, Jae Chul ;
Yoo, Byung Moo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (46) :8580-8594
[18]   Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloon dilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones? [J].
Kim, Tae Hyeon ;
Oh, Hyo Jeong ;
Lee, Jun Young ;
Sohn, Young Woo .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (10) :3330-3337
[19]   How to predict the outcome of endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones? [J].
Lee, Sang Hyub ;
Park, Joo Kyung ;
Yoon, Won Jae ;
Lee, Jun Kyu ;
Ryu, Ji Kon ;
Kim, Yong-Tae ;
Yoon, Yong Bum .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 42 (08) :1006-1010
[20]   Mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stones [J].
Leung, JW ;
Tu, R .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (06) :688-690