Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

被引:23
|
作者
Tsuchida, Kouhei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Mari [1 ]
Tsubouchi, Misako [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro [1 ]
Tsuchida, Chieko [1 ]
Yoshitake, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Takako [1 ]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
来源
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; DIFFICULT; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PLUS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; PANCREATITIS; PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
    Kouhei Tsuchida
    Mari Iwasaki
    Misako Tsubouchi
    Tsunehiro Suzuki
    Chieko Tsuchida
    Naoto Yoshitake
    Takako Sasai
    Hideyuki Hiraishi
    BMC Gastroenterology, 15
  • [2] Small endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation in the treatment of patients with large bile duct stones
    Chu, X.
    Zhang, H.
    Qu, R.
    Huang, G.
    Guo, C.
    Wang, F.
    Cheng, M.
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2017, 49 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [3] Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation combined with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones
    Meine, Gilmara Coelho
    Baron, Todd H.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (05) : 1119 - 1126
  • [4] Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Lim, Sun Gyo
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Shin, Sung Jae
    Lee, Kee Myung
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [5] Significance of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Preceding Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in the Management of Bile Duct Stones
    Okuno, Mitsuru
    Iwashita, Takuji
    Yoshida, Kensaku
    Maruta, Akinori
    Uemura, Shinya
    Nakashima, Masanori
    Mukai, Tsuyoshi
    Ando, Nobuhiro
    Iwata, Keisuke
    Horibe, Yohei
    Adachi, Seiji
    Mabuchi, Masatoshi
    Doi, Shinpei
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    Shimizu, Masahito
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (02) : 597 - 602
  • [6] Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of large bile duct stones
    Park, Jin-Seok
    Jeong, Seok
    Lee, Dong Ki
    Jang, Sung Ill
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Yoo, Byoung Moo
    Park, Shin Goo
    Lee, Don Haeng
    ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [7] Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic papillary regular-balloon dilation for removal of large bile-duct stones
    Fujisawa, Toshio
    Kagawa, Koichi
    Hisatomi, Kantaro
    Kubota, Kensuke
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    Matsuhashi, Nobuyuki
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (06) : 405 - 409
  • [8] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
    Jin, Piao-Piao
    Cheng, Jian-Feng
    Liu, Dan
    Mei, Mei
    Xu, Zhao-Qi
    Sun, Lei-Min
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (18) : 5548 - 5556
  • [9] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones
    Attam, Rajeev
    Freeman, Martin L.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2009, 16 (05): : 618 - 623
  • [10] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation both without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones: A propensity-matched analysis
    Hakuta, Ryunosuke
    Kawahata, Shuhei
    Kogure, Hirofumi
    Nakai, Yousuke
    Saito, Kei
    Saito, Tomotaka
    Hamada, Tsuyoshi
    Takahara, Naminatsu
    Uchino, Rie
    Mizuno, Suguru
    Tsujino, Takeshi
    Tada, Minoru
    Sakamoto, Naoya
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    Koike, Kazuhiko
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 31 (01) : 59 - 68