Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology

被引:23
|
作者
Park, Ho Young [1 ,2 ]
Suh, Chong Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Woo, Sungmin [3 ]
Kim, Pyeong Hwa [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Kyung Won [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Res Inst Radiol, Coll Med, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Reporting quality; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; PRISMA; 2020; TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY; PROSTATE-CANCER; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; PUBLICATION; PERFORMANCE; GRADE; MRI; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2021.0808
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines' recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. Results: Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. Conclusion: Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 369
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality Assessment for Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis on Antidepressant Therapy Published in Chinese Journals
    Xiao, Zhijun
    Zhang, Ye
    Wang, Yan
    Xu, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 8 (07) : 614 - 620
  • [32] Systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiac neurosis for development of clinical practice guidelines of Korean medicine
    Park, Hui-Yeong
    Lee, Hyun Woo
    Song, Geum-Ju
    Hong, Sunggyu
    Hong, Sunghee
    Suh, Hyo-Weon
    Yoon, Seok-In
    Park, Chan
    Chung, Sun-Yong
    Kim, Jong Woo
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [33] Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies The PRISMA-DTA Statement
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Moher, David
    Thombs, Brett D.
    McGrath, Trevor A.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (04): : 388 - 396
  • [34] Systematic review of quality of diabetes care in Europe from published papers and comparison with Quality and Outcomes Framework results from the UK
    Gadsby, R.
    Davies, M.
    Majeed, A.
    Khunti, K.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2007, 24 : 68 - 68
  • [35] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines
    Basenach, Lara
    Renneberg, Babette
    Salbach, Harriet
    Dreier, Michael
    Woelfling, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2023, 12 (01) : 9 - 25
  • [36] Design Characteristics of Studies Reporting the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diagnostic Analysis of Medical Images: Results from Recently Published Papers
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Jang, Hye Young
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Shin, Youngbin
    Park, Seong Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (03) : 405 - 410
  • [37] Exercise Programs Delivered According to Guidelines Improve Mobility in People With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pogrebnoy, Dina
    Dennett, Amy
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 101 (01): : 154 - 165
  • [38] Exercise programs delivered according to guidelines improve mobility in people with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pogrebnoy, Dina
    Dennett, Amy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2019, 14 : 8 - 8
  • [39] EFFECTS OF BEETROOT JUICE ON BLOOD PRESSURE IN HYPERTENSION ACCORDING TO ESH GUIDELINES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Gronroos, Rebecca
    Eggertsen, Robert
    Bernhardsson, Susanne
    Bjork, Marcus Praetorius
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2023, 37 : 18 - 18
  • [40] Global prevalence of functional dyspepsia according to Rome criteria, 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwanjoo Lee
    Chang-il Kwon
    Abdullah Özgür Yeniova
    Ai Koyanagi
    Louis Jacob
    Lee Smith
    Seung Won Lee
    Masoud Rahmati
    Ju-Young Shin
    Jae Il Shin
    Wonyoung Cho
    Dong Keon Yon
    Scientific Reports, 14