Comparison of arterial closure devices in antegrade and retrograde punctures

被引:18
|
作者
Chiu, Albert Ho Yuen [1 ]
Wal, Ross Vander [1 ]
Tee, Kenneth [1 ]
Knight, Roslyn [1 ]
Coles, Simon Richard [1 ]
Nadkarni, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
femoral artery; arterial puncture; arterial closure devices; vascular closure devices; complication; Angio-Seal Perclose; antegrade puncture; retrograde puncture;
D O I
10.1583/07-2190.1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy, primary failure rates, and complications for the Angio-Seal and Perclose closure devices in antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures during peripheral angioplasty procedures. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted between April 2002 and June 2006 of all patients who had a CFA puncture and no other intervention planned during the same admission. Patients undergoing thrombolysis were excluded. Of 215 punctures in 191 patients, 123 closures in 97 patients (82 men; mean age 69.5 +/- 10.4 years, range 41-93) were eligible for analysis. Of these, 49 punctures were antegrade and 74 were retrograde. An Angio-Seal device was used in 40 closures, while 83 punctures were closed with a Perclose device. Deployment outcomes and complications were compared between devices for each puncture direction and between antegrade and retrograde punctures. Results: Seventy-eight (63.4%) of the 123 closures reached the primary endpoint of complication-free progress to discharge, comprising 30 (61.2%) of the 49 antegrade closures and 48 (64.9%) of the 74 retrograde closures. There was no significant difference between the devices for the primary endpoint. Twenty-two (17.9%) attempted closures failed. Forty-one (33.3%) closures had a complication after the procedure, but none required further intervention. In antegrade closures, Angio-Seal had a significantly lower rate of primary failure (11.1% versus 38.7% for Perclose, p=0.038). Antegrade closures had a higher rate of primary failure (p < 0.01); however, this did not translate into any significant differences in postprocedural complications. No significant differences in primary failure or complication rates were found between the devices when used in retrograde punctures. Conclusion: Angio-Seal had a lower rate of primary failure than Perclose in antegrade puncture closures. We believe this reinforces the need for larger studies to compare closure devices in antegrade punctures.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advancements in Vascular Closure Devices for Effective Hemostasis in Femoral Artery Interventions
    Ding, Wanyu
    Luo, Yue
    Li, Wei
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [32] ESR Essentials: arterial vascular access and closure devices-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe
    Spiliopoulos, Stavros
    Prountzos, Spyridon
    Grigoriadis, Stavros
    Diamantopoulos, Athanasios
    Paraskevopoulos, Ioannis
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (04) : 1858 - 1867
  • [33] MynxGrip for Closure of Antegrade Puncture After Peripheral Interventions With Same-Day Discharge
    Pruski, Maciej J., Jr.
    Blachut, Aleksandra M.
    Konkolewska, Magda
    Janas, Adam
    Hrycek, Eugeniusz
    Buszman, Piotr P.
    Kiesz, Radoslaw S.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 67 - 71
  • [34] Acute arterial occlusion due to vascular closure device: A report of two cases
    Celik, Suleyman Utku
    Cetinkaya, Omer Arda
    Konca, Can
    Koc, Mehmet Ali
    Kirimker, Elvan Onur
    Kocaay, Akin Firat
    Alacayir, Iskender
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2018, 24 (02): : 181 - 183
  • [35] Incidence, predictors, and treatment options of critical limb ischaemia after use of collagen plug-based vascular closure devices
    Amer, Omran
    Binger, Siri
    Desch, Steffen
    Harnoss, Hans Michael
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Thiele, Holger
    Eitel, Ingo
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2015, 11 (07) : 816 - 823
  • [36] Arterial Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression for Femoral Haemostasis in Interventional Radiological Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rajib Das
    Kamran Ahmed
    Thanos Athanasiou
    Robert A. Morgan
    Anna-Maria Belli
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2011, 34 : 723 - 738
  • [37] Arterial Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression for Femoral Haemostasis in Interventional Radiological Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Das, Rajib
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Morgan, Robert A.
    Belli, Anna-Maria
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (04) : 723 - 738
  • [38] Early decision-analytic modeling - a case study on vascular closure devices
    Brandes, Alina
    Sinner, Moritz F.
    Kaeaeb, Stefan
    Rogowski, Wolf H.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [39] Can vascular closure devices reduce complications?
    Sanborn, Timothy A.
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 2 (06) : 655 - 658
  • [40] Vascular Closure Devices in Interventional Radiology Practice
    Patel, Rafiuddin
    Muller-Hulsbeck, Stefan
    Morgan, Robert
    Uberoi, Raman
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (04) : 781 - 793