Comparison of arterial closure devices in antegrade and retrograde punctures

被引:18
|
作者
Chiu, Albert Ho Yuen [1 ]
Wal, Ross Vander [1 ]
Tee, Kenneth [1 ]
Knight, Roslyn [1 ]
Coles, Simon Richard [1 ]
Nadkarni, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
femoral artery; arterial puncture; arterial closure devices; vascular closure devices; complication; Angio-Seal Perclose; antegrade puncture; retrograde puncture;
D O I
10.1583/07-2190.1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy, primary failure rates, and complications for the Angio-Seal and Perclose closure devices in antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures during peripheral angioplasty procedures. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted between April 2002 and June 2006 of all patients who had a CFA puncture and no other intervention planned during the same admission. Patients undergoing thrombolysis were excluded. Of 215 punctures in 191 patients, 123 closures in 97 patients (82 men; mean age 69.5 +/- 10.4 years, range 41-93) were eligible for analysis. Of these, 49 punctures were antegrade and 74 were retrograde. An Angio-Seal device was used in 40 closures, while 83 punctures were closed with a Perclose device. Deployment outcomes and complications were compared between devices for each puncture direction and between antegrade and retrograde punctures. Results: Seventy-eight (63.4%) of the 123 closures reached the primary endpoint of complication-free progress to discharge, comprising 30 (61.2%) of the 49 antegrade closures and 48 (64.9%) of the 74 retrograde closures. There was no significant difference between the devices for the primary endpoint. Twenty-two (17.9%) attempted closures failed. Forty-one (33.3%) closures had a complication after the procedure, but none required further intervention. In antegrade closures, Angio-Seal had a significantly lower rate of primary failure (11.1% versus 38.7% for Perclose, p=0.038). Antegrade closures had a higher rate of primary failure (p < 0.01); however, this did not translate into any significant differences in postprocedural complications. No significant differences in primary failure or complication rates were found between the devices when used in retrograde punctures. Conclusion: Angio-Seal had a lower rate of primary failure than Perclose in antegrade puncture closures. We believe this reinforces the need for larger studies to compare closure devices in antegrade punctures.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and Safety of the Angioseal Vascular Closure Device Post Antegrade Puncture
    S. Looby
    A. N. Keeling
    A. McErlean
    M. F. Given
    T. Geoghegan
    M. J. Lee
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008, 31 : 558 - 562
  • [22] Review of Vascular Closure Devices
    Schwartz, Bryan G.
    Burstein, Steven
    Economides, Christina
    Kloner, Robert A.
    Shavelle, David M.
    Mayeda, Guy S.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 22 (12) : 599 - 607
  • [23] A close look at closure devices
    Van den Berg, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 47 (03) : 285 - 295
  • [24] Contemporary Use and Outcomes of Arterial Closure Devices After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program
    Prouse, Andrew
    Gunzburger, Elise
    Yang, Fan
    Morrison, Justin
    Valle, Javier A.
    Armstrong, Ehrin J.
    Waldo, Stephen W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (04):
  • [25] An evidence-based approach to femoral arterial access and closure
    Turi, Zoltan G.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (01) : 6 - +
  • [26] Obesity: An Independent Risk Factor for Insufficient Hemostasis Using the AngioSeal Vascular Closure Device After Antegrade Puncture
    Peter Minko
    Marcus Katoh
    Stefan Gräber
    Arno Buecker
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012, 35 : 775 - 778
  • [27] StarClose™ femoral arteriotomy closure device:: an advance in arterial closure
    Ruygrok, PN
    Chou, TM
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2005, 2 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [28] Comparison of Exo-Seal® and Angio-Seal® for arterial puncture site closure A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial
    Ketterle, Johannes
    Rittger, Harald
    Helmig, Inga
    Klinghammer, Lutz
    Zimmermann, Stefan
    Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
    Brachmann, Johannes
    Nef, Holger
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Schlundt, Christian
    HERZ, 2015, 40 (05) : 809 - 816
  • [29] Management of infected femoral closure devices
    Geary, K
    Landers, JT
    Fiore, W
    Riggs, P
    CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 10 (02): : 161 - 163
  • [30] Case series of closure devices complications
    Chami, Tarek
    Janus, Scott E.
    Shishehbor, Mehdi H.
    Li, Jun
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 100 (02) : 290 - 294