Comparison of arterial closure devices in antegrade and retrograde punctures

被引:18
|
作者
Chiu, Albert Ho Yuen [1 ]
Wal, Ross Vander [1 ]
Tee, Kenneth [1 ]
Knight, Roslyn [1 ]
Coles, Simon Richard [1 ]
Nadkarni, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
femoral artery; arterial puncture; arterial closure devices; vascular closure devices; complication; Angio-Seal Perclose; antegrade puncture; retrograde puncture;
D O I
10.1583/07-2190.1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy, primary failure rates, and complications for the Angio-Seal and Perclose closure devices in antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures during peripheral angioplasty procedures. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted between April 2002 and June 2006 of all patients who had a CFA puncture and no other intervention planned during the same admission. Patients undergoing thrombolysis were excluded. Of 215 punctures in 191 patients, 123 closures in 97 patients (82 men; mean age 69.5 +/- 10.4 years, range 41-93) were eligible for analysis. Of these, 49 punctures were antegrade and 74 were retrograde. An Angio-Seal device was used in 40 closures, while 83 punctures were closed with a Perclose device. Deployment outcomes and complications were compared between devices for each puncture direction and between antegrade and retrograde punctures. Results: Seventy-eight (63.4%) of the 123 closures reached the primary endpoint of complication-free progress to discharge, comprising 30 (61.2%) of the 49 antegrade closures and 48 (64.9%) of the 74 retrograde closures. There was no significant difference between the devices for the primary endpoint. Twenty-two (17.9%) attempted closures failed. Forty-one (33.3%) closures had a complication after the procedure, but none required further intervention. In antegrade closures, Angio-Seal had a significantly lower rate of primary failure (11.1% versus 38.7% for Perclose, p=0.038). Antegrade closures had a higher rate of primary failure (p < 0.01); however, this did not translate into any significant differences in postprocedural complications. No significant differences in primary failure or complication rates were found between the devices when used in retrograde punctures. Conclusion: Angio-Seal had a lower rate of primary failure than Perclose in antegrade puncture closures. We believe this reinforces the need for larger studies to compare closure devices in antegrade punctures.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The StarClose Vascular Closure Device in Antegrade and Retrograde Punctures: A Single-Center Experience
    Chiu, Albert Ho Yuen
    Coles, Simon Richard
    Tibballs, Jonathan
    Nadkarni, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 17 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [2] Multicenter safety and efficacy analysis of assisted closure after antegrade arterial punctures using the StarClose device
    Williams, Robin Edward Thomas
    Angel, Claude Y.
    Bourkaib, Ryad
    Brenot, Philippe
    Commeau, Philippe
    Fisher, Robert Kendall
    Jackson, Ralph
    Kay, Caroline Helen
    Le Dref, Olivier
    Riou, Jean-Yves
    Rose, John
    Macdonald, Sumaira
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (04) : 498 - 505
  • [3] A novel double clip-based vascular closure device in antegrade and retrograde femoral punctures: A single-center experience in peripheral non-cardiac procedures
    Thurner, Annette
    Heuer, Anjana
    Augustin, Anne Marie
    Gietzen, Carsten
    Bley, Thorsten A.
    Kickuth, Ralph
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2022, 23 (05) : 778 - 787
  • [4] Retrospective cohort study on Angio-Seal closure device safety and effectiveness in antegrade superficial femoral artery punctures: A comparison with antegrade common femoral artery punctures
    Adlan, Tarig
    Shahin, Yousef
    Kember, Peter
    Isaacs, John
    Seymour, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 48 : 225 - 227
  • [5] Safety and Efficacy of Arterial Closure Devices Following Antegrade Femoral Access: A Case-Control Study
    Barrette, Louis-Xavier
    Vance, Ansar Z.
    Mantell, Mark P.
    Kratz, Kathleen M.
    Redmond, Jonas W.
    Clark, Timothy W., I
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 54 (07) : 612 - 617
  • [6] Evaluation of the 6-F ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device in Antegrade Femoral Artery Punctures
    Maxien, Daniel
    Behrends, Barbara
    Eberhardt, Karla M.
    Saam, Tobias
    Thieme, Sven F.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Treitl, Marcus
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2012, 19 (06) : 836 - 843
  • [7] Prospective Nonrandomized Trial of Manual Compression and Angio-Seal and StarClose Arterial Closure Devices in Common Femoral Punctures
    Patanjali Chaturvedi
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2007, 30 : 812 - 812
  • [8] The Use of Arterial Closure Devices for Incidental Arterial Injury
    Kirkwood, Melissa L.
    Wahlgren, Carl-Magnus
    Desai, Tina R.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 42 (05) : 471 - 476
  • [9] Single-center comparison of the efficacy and complications of arterial vascular closure devices in interventional radiology
    Elmasri, Matthew A.
    Kee, Stephen T.
    Moriarty, John M.
    Gomes, Antoinette
    Lee, Edward W.
    McWilliams, Justin P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2017, 18 (04) : 339 - 344
  • [10] Effectiveness of Arterial Closure Devices for Preventing Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention An Instrumental Variable Analysis
    Wimmer, Neil J.
    Secemsky, Eric A.
    Mauri, Laura
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita
    Dai, David
    McCabe, James M.
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (04)