Effectiveness of aspirin vs. clopidogrel in dogs with immune mediated haemolytic anaemia evaluated by serial thromboelastography and platelet mapping

Most dogs with immune mediated haemolytic anaemia (IMHA) are hypercoagulable, as measured by thromboelastography (TEG). Thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) has been used to assess platelet function in human patients treated with aspirin or clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to compare platelet thromboxane A(2)-receptor inhibition (TXA(2-)RI) and platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor inhibition (ADP-RI) as measured by TEG-PM in dogs with primary IMHA receiving aspirin or clopidogrel to determine if TEG-PM might be useful to monitor treatment. Eighteen client-owned dogs with IMHA were enmled in a prospective double blinded study. Dogs were randomised to receive aspirin or clopidogrel in addition to standard therapy. Thromboelastography was measured before, and 1 and 4 days after commencing treatment. Thromboelastography-PM was performed on days 1 and 4. Non-responders were defined as < 50 % platelet thromboxane A2-receptor inhibition (TXA(2-)RI) and in the aspirin group and < 50 % platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor inhibition (ADP-RI) in the clopidogrel group, on day 4. Mean platelet TXA(2-)RI and platelet ADP-RI were not significantly different between groups at any timepoint (P > 0.05). The overall mean percentage inhibition of TXA(2-)receptor was 25 % (aspirin 33 %, clopidogrel 15 %), and of ADP-receptor was 82 % (aspirin 83 %, clopidogrel 80 %). On day 4, 6/9 dogs (66 %) in the aspirin group and 2/8 dogs (25 %) in the clopidogrel group were non-responders (P = 0.086). Two dogs defined as responders based on TEG-PM developed thromboembolism. Overall, there was no significant difference in efficacy between aspirin and clopidogrel based on measurement of receptor inhibition using TEG-PM (P > 0.05), and routine TEG was not reliable for monitoring treatment response in dogs with IMHA. In some dogs, there was a discrepancy between TEG-PM results and clinical response. Further investigation of TEG-PM use in dogs, including its usefulness to monitor treatment response and adjust treatment in individual dogs and any effect of anaemia, is warranted.