Towards standardising market-independent indicators for quantifying energy flexibility in buildings

被引:35
作者
Kathirgamanathan, Anjukan [1 ,2 ]
Pean, Thibault [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Kun [5 ]
De Rosa, Mattia [1 ,2 ]
Salom, Jaume [3 ]
Kummert, Michael [5 ]
Finn, Donal P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Energy Inst, Dublin, Spain
[3] Catalonia Inst Energy Res IREC, Thermal Energy & Bldg Performance Grp, Jard Ns Dones Negre 1, Barcelona 08930, Spain
[4] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Automat Control Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Polytech Montreal, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Smart grid; Buildings; Energy flexibility; Demand side management; Demand response; Thermal energy storage; STRUCTURAL THERMAL STORAGE; DEMAND FLEXIBILITY; HEAT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings are increasingly being seen as a potential source of energy flexibility to the smart grid as a form of demand side management. Indicators are required to quantify the energy flexibility available from buildings, enabling a basis for a contractual framework between the relevant stakeholders such as end users, aggregators and grid operators. In the literature, there is a lack of consensus and standardisation in terms of approaches and indicators for quantifying energy flexibility. In the present paper, current approaches are reviewed and the most recent and relevant market independent indicators are compared through analysis of four different case studies comprising varying building types, climates and control schemes to assess their robustness and applicability. Of the indicators compared, certain indicators are found to be more suitable for use by the end user when considering energy and carbon dioxide emission reductions. Other indicators are more useful for the grid operator. The recommended indicators are found to be robust to different demand response contexts, such as type of energy flexibility, control scheme, climate and building types. They capture the provided flexibility quantity, its shifting efficiency and rebound effect. A final cost index is also recommended given specific market conditions to capture the cost of a building providing energy flexibility. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Demand side flexibility: Potentials and building performance implications
    Aduda, K. O.
    Labeodan, T.
    Zeiler, W.
    Boxem, G.
    Zhao, Y.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 22 : 146 - 163
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, P ESIM 2018 MONTR CA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, R 2000 STANDARD
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, 55 ANSIASHRAE
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [7] [Anonymous], ROBUST RESERVE PROVI
  • [8] [Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [9] [Anonymous], CLIMA 2016 P 12 REHV
  • [10] [Anonymous], TRNSYS 17 TRANSIENT