Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study

被引:15
|
作者
Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E. [1 ]
Crosbie, James [2 ]
Engledow, Alec [2 ]
Windsor, Alastair [2 ]
Cohen, Charles R. G. [2 ]
Emmanuel, Anton V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Pelv Floor & GI Physiol, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
关键词
Sacral nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Fecal incontinence; Afferent function; Mechanism of action; Barostat; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; URINARY DISTURBANCES; NEUROMODULATION; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS; BLADDER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318220c0ba
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: This study took place at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH(2)O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH(2)O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow. CONCLUSION: Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1140
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation
    Michelsen, Hanne B.
    Buntzen, Steen
    Krogh, Klaus
    Laurberg, Soren
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (07) : 1039 - 1044
  • [42] Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: A randomized, controlled study
    Tjandra, Joe J.
    Chan, Miranda K. Y.
    Yeh, Chung Hung
    Murray-Green, Carolyn
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 494 - 502
  • [43] Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective single center study
    van Voskuilen, AC
    Oerlemans, DJAJ
    Weil, EHJ
    de Bie, RA
    van Kerrebroeck, PEVA
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) : 366 - 372
  • [44] Maternal and foetal physiological response of sacral surface electrical stimulation during pregnancy: A preliminary study
    Katsura, Daisuke
    Tsuji, Shunichiro
    Hayashi, Kaori
    Tokoro, Shinsuke
    Hoshiyama, Takako
    Kita, Nobuyuki
    Murakami, Takashi
    EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 107 (05) : 508 - 514
  • [45] Bilateral compared with unilateral sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results of a randomized, single-blinded crossover study
    Duelund-Jakobsen, J.
    Buntzen, S.
    Lundby, L.
    Sorensen, M.
    Laurberg, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (12) : 1085 - 1093
  • [46] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation vs sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a comparative case-matched study
    Al Asari, S.
    Meurette, G.
    Mantoo, S.
    Kubis, C.
    Wyart, V.
    Lehur, P. -A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (11) : O393 - O399
  • [47] Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tactile training improved sensory function in a chronic stroke patient
    Kilgard, Michael P.
    Rennaker, Robert L.
    Alexander, Jen
    Dawson, Jesse
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2018, 42 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [48] Factors affecting the outcome of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. The value of the new tined lead electrode
    Altomare, D. F.
    Rinaldi, M.
    Lobascio, P.
    Marino, F.
    Giuliani, R. T.
    Cuccia, F.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (02) : 198 - 202
  • [49] Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots modify colonic motility? Results of a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study
    Gallas, S.
    Gourcerol, G.
    Ducrotte, P.
    Mosni, G.
    Menard, J. -F.
    Michot, F.
    Leroi, A. -M.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2009, 21 (04) : 411 - 419
  • [50] A randomised, controlled study of small intestinal motility in patients treated with sacral nerve stimulation for irritable bowel syndrome
    Fassov, Janne
    Lundby, Lilli
    Worsoe, Jonas
    Buntzen, Steen
    Laurberg, Soren
    Krogh, Klaus
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 14