Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study

被引:15
|
作者
Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E. [1 ]
Crosbie, James [2 ]
Engledow, Alec [2 ]
Windsor, Alastair [2 ]
Cohen, Charles R. G. [2 ]
Emmanuel, Anton V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Pelv Floor & GI Physiol, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
关键词
Sacral nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Fecal incontinence; Afferent function; Mechanism of action; Barostat; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; URINARY DISTURBANCES; NEUROMODULATION; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS; BLADDER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318220c0ba
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: This study took place at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH(2)O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH(2)O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow. CONCLUSION: Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1140
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Double-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal Incontinence
    Vaizey, CJ
    Kamm, MA
    Roy, AJ
    Nicholls, RJ
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (03) : 298 - 302
  • [32] Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    de Miguel, M.
    Oteiza, F.
    Ciga, M. A.
    Armendariz, P.
    Marzo, J.
    Ortiz, H.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [33] Effects of temporary sacral nerve stimulation on gastrointestinal motility and function in patients with chronic refractory slow-transit constipation
    D. F. Altomare
    A. Picciariello
    A. Di Ciaula
    M. Rinaldi
    M. De Fazio
    P. Portincasa
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2021, 25 : 291 - 297
  • [34] Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation - an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera
    Buchs, N. C.
    Dembe, J. -C.
    Robert-Yap, J.
    Roche, B.
    Fasel, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 23 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [35] Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation—an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera
    N. C. Buchs
    J.-C. Dembe
    J. Robert-Yap
    B. Roche
    J. Fasel
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2008, 23 : 85 - 91
  • [36] Percutaneous electrical stimulation of sensory nerve fibers to,improve motor function: applications in voiding dysfunction
    Lee, YH
    Lee, IS
    Lee, JY
    CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS, 2005, 5 (05) : 542 - 545
  • [37] Does Sacral Nerve Stimulation Improve Continence Through Enhanced Sensitivity of the Anal Canal? A Pilot Study
    Haas, S.
    Brock, C.
    Krogh, K.
    Gram, M.
    Lundby, L.
    Drewes, A. M.
    Laurberg, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (11) : 1039 - 1046
  • [38] Randomized double-blind crossover study of alternative stimulator settings in sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
    Duelund-Jakobsen, J.
    Dudding, T.
    Bradshaw, E.
    Buntzen, S.
    Lundby, L.
    Laurberg, S.
    Vaizey, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (10) : 1445 - 1452
  • [39] Stapled transanal rectal resection and sacral nerve stimulation - impact on faecal incontinence and quality of life
    Boenicke, L.
    Kim, M.
    Reibetanz, J.
    Germer, C. -T.
    Isbert, C.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : 480 - 489
  • [40] Costs and outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in New Zealand: a 10-year observational study
    Varghese, Chris
    Wells, Cameron I.
    O'Grady, Gregory
    Bissett, Ian P.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (04) : 569 - 575