Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study

被引:15
|
作者
Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E. [1 ]
Crosbie, James [2 ]
Engledow, Alec [2 ]
Windsor, Alastair [2 ]
Cohen, Charles R. G. [2 ]
Emmanuel, Anton V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Pelv Floor & GI Physiol, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
关键词
Sacral nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Fecal incontinence; Afferent function; Mechanism of action; Barostat; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; URINARY DISTURBANCES; NEUROMODULATION; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS; BLADDER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318220c0ba
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: This study took place at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH(2)O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH(2)O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow. CONCLUSION: Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1140
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Device Revision and Explantation in a Single Center, Multidisciplinary Study
    Gevelinger, Matthew M.
    Sanderson, Derrick J.
    Jaworski, Elaine
    Doyle, Paula J.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (08): : 1201 - 1206
  • [22] Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with severe fecal incontinence after rectal resection
    P. Moya
    A. Arroyo
    L. Soriano-Irigaray
    A. Frangi
    F. Candela Polo
    R. Calpena Rico
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2012, 16 : 263 - 264
  • [23] A Pilot Study of Non-invasive Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Constipation in Childhood and Adolescence
    Besendoerfer, Manuel
    Kohl, Martin
    Schellerer, Vera
    Carbon, Roman
    Diez, Sonja
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2020, 8
  • [24] Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence
    Vaizey, CJ
    Kamm, MA
    Turner, IC
    Nicholls, RJ
    Woloszko, J
    GUT, 1999, 44 (03) : 407 - 412
  • [25] A double-blinded randomized multicentre study to investigate the effect of changes in stimulation parameters on sacral nerve stimulation for constipation
    Thomas, G. P.
    Duelund-Jakobsen, J.
    Dudding, T. C.
    Bradshaw, E.
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Alam, A.
    Emmanuel, A.
    Thin, N.
    Knowles, C. H.
    Laurberg, S.
    Vaizey, C. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (11) : 990 - 995
  • [26] Temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following pelvic radiotherapy
    Maeda, Yasuko
    Hoyer, Morten
    Lundby, Lilli
    Buntzen, Steen
    Laurberg, Soren
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [27] A pilot study of chronic pudendal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence for those who have failed sacral nerve stimulation
    Thomas, G. P.
    George, A. T.
    Dudding, T. C.
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Vaizey, C. J.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (08) : 731 - 737
  • [28] A pilot study of chronic pudendal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence for those who have failed sacral nerve stimulation
    G. P. Thomas
    A. T. George
    T. C. Dudding
    R. J. Nicholls
    C. J. Vaizey
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2014, 18 : 731 - 737
  • [29] A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    Fassov, Janne L.
    Lundby, Lilli
    Laurberg, Soren
    Buntzen, Steen
    Krogh, Klaus
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [30] Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of the lower urinary tract function disorders
    Miotla, Pawel
    Kulik-Rechberger, Beata
    Skorupski, Pawel
    Rechberger, Tomasz
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 82 (11) : 851 - 856