Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study

被引:15
|
作者
Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E. [1 ]
Crosbie, James [2 ]
Engledow, Alec [2 ]
Windsor, Alastair [2 ]
Cohen, Charles R. G. [2 ]
Emmanuel, Anton V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Pelv Floor & GI Physiol, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
关键词
Sacral nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Fecal incontinence; Afferent function; Mechanism of action; Barostat; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; URINARY DISTURBANCES; NEUROMODULATION; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS; BLADDER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318220c0ba
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: This study took place at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH(2)O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH(2)O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow. CONCLUSION: Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1140
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Patients After Rectal Resection—Preliminary Report
    Brigitte Holzer
    Harald R. Rosen
    Wolfgang Zaglmaier
    Reinhold Klug
    Bernhard Beer
    Gabriele Novi
    Rudolf Schiessel
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12 : 921 - 925
  • [12] Sacral nerve stimulation in patients after rectal resection - Preliminary report
    Holzer, Brigitte
    Rosen, Harald R.
    Zaglmaier, Wolfgang
    Klug, Reinhold
    Beer, Bernhard
    Novi, Gabriele
    Schiessel, Rudolf
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (05) : 921 - 925
  • [13] Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence following surgery for rectal prolapse repair:: A multicenter study
    Jarrett, MED
    Matzel, KE
    Stösser, M
    Baeten, CGM
    Kamm, MA
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (06) : 1243 - 1248
  • [14] A prospective trial of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for constipation associated with neurological disease
    Khan, U.
    Mason, J. M.
    Mecci, M.
    Yiannakou, Y.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (12) : 1001 - 1009
  • [15] Sacral Nerve Stimulation at Subsensory Threshold Does Not Compromise Treatment Efficacy Results From a Randomized, Blinded Crossover Study
    Duelund-Jakobsen, Jakob
    Buntzen, Steen
    Lundby, Lilli
    Laurberg, Soren
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (02) : 219 - 223
  • [16] A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy
    Thomas, G. P.
    Bradshaw, E.
    Vaizey, C. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (11) : 939 - 942
  • [17] Improved Sexual and Urinary Function in Women with Sacral Nerve Stimulation
    Gill, Bradley C.
    Swartz, Mia A.
    Firoozi, Farzeen
    Rackley, Raymond R.
    Moore, Courtenay K.
    Goldman, Howard B.
    Vasavada, Sandip P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2011, 14 (05): : 436 - 443
  • [18] Temporary sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A pilot study
    Lundby, Lilli
    Krogh, Klaus
    Buntzen, Steen
    Laurberg, Soren
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (07) : 1074 - 1078
  • [19] Does sacral nerve stimulation improve global pelvic function in women?
    Jadav, A. M.
    Wadhawan, H.
    Jones, G. L.
    Wheldon, L. W.
    Radley, S. C.
    Brown, S. R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (07) : 848 - 857
  • [20] A pilot study of transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
    Thomas, G. P.
    Norton, C.
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Vaizey, C. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (11) : 1406 - 1409