Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study

被引:15
作者
Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E. [1 ]
Crosbie, James [2 ]
Engledow, Alec [2 ]
Windsor, Alastair [2 ]
Cohen, Charles R. G. [2 ]
Emmanuel, Anton V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Pelv Floor & GI Physiol, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
关键词
Sacral nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Fecal incontinence; Afferent function; Mechanism of action; Barostat; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; URINARY DISTURBANCES; NEUROMODULATION; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS; BLADDER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318220c0ba
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: This study took place at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH(2)O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH(2)O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow. CONCLUSION: Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1140
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Permanent sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence and associated urinary disturbances [J].
Altomare, DF ;
Rinaldi, M ;
Petrolino, M ;
Monitillo, V ;
Sallustio, P ;
Veglia, A ;
De Fazio, M ;
Guglielmi, A ;
Memeo, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2004, 19 (03) :203-209
[2]   Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence [J].
Bharucha, AE ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Harper, CM ;
Hough, D ;
Daube, JR ;
Stevens, C ;
Seide, B ;
Riederer, SJ ;
Zinsmeister, AR .
GUT, 2005, 54 (04) :546-555
[3]   Day-to-day reproducibility of anorectal sensorimotor assessments in healthy subjects [J].
Bharucha, AE ;
Seide, B ;
Fox, JC ;
Zinsmeister, AR .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2004, 16 (02) :241-250
[4]   Barostat testing of rectal sensation and compliance in humans: comparison of results across two centres and overall reproducibility [J].
Cremonini, F ;
Houghton, LA ;
Camilleri, M ;
Ferber, I ;
Fell, C ;
Cox, V ;
Castillo, EJ ;
Alpers, DH ;
Dewit, OE ;
Gray, E ;
Lea, R ;
Zinsmeister, AR ;
Whorwell, PJ .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2005, 17 (06) :810-820
[5]   Laser Doppler measurement of rectal mucosal blood flow [J].
Emmanuel, AV ;
Kamm, MA .
GUT, 1999, 45 (01) :64-69
[6]   Rectal compliance as a routine measurement - Extreme volumes have direct clinical impact and normal volumes exclude rectum as a problem [J].
Felt-Bersma, RJF ;
Sloots, CEJ ;
Poen, AC ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Meuwissen, SGM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (12) :1732-1738
[7]   Studies of the latency of pelvic floor contraction during peripheral nerve evaluation show that the muscle response is reflexly mediated [J].
Fowler, CJ ;
Swinn, MJ ;
Goodwin, RJ ;
Oliver, S ;
Craggs, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) :881-883
[8]   Barostat measurement of rectal compliance and capacity [J].
Fox, M ;
Thumshirn, M ;
Fried, M ;
Schwizer, W .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (03) :360-370
[9]   Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: Results in 40 patients - Evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders [J].
Ganio, E ;
Masin, A ;
Ratto, C ;
Altomare, DF ;
Ripetti, V ;
Clerico, G ;
Lise, M ;
Doglietto, GB ;
Memeo, V ;
Landolfi, V ;
Del Genio, A ;
Arullani, A ;
Giardiello, G ;
de Seta, F .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (09) :1261-1267
[10]  
Ganio E, 2001, DIS COLON RECTUM, V44, P619, DOI 10.1007/BF02234555