Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study

被引:15
|
作者
Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E. [1 ]
Crosbie, James [2 ]
Engledow, Alec [2 ]
Windsor, Alastair [2 ]
Cohen, Charles R. G. [2 ]
Emmanuel, Anton V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Pelv Floor & GI Physiol, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
关键词
Sacral nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Fecal incontinence; Afferent function; Mechanism of action; Barostat; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; URINARY DISTURBANCES; NEUROMODULATION; PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; MECHANISMS; BLADDER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0b013e318220c0ba
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: This study took place at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH(2)O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH(2)O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders. LIMITATIONS: The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow. CONCLUSION: Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1140
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sacral nerve stimulation changes rectal sensitivity and biomechanical properties in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
    Fassov, J.
    Brock, C.
    Lundby, L.
    Drewes, A. M.
    Gregersen, H.
    Buntzen, S.
    Laurberg, S.
    Krogh, K.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2014, 26 (11) : 1597 - 1604
  • [2] Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study of Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Rectal Evacuatory Dysfunction and Rectal Hyposensitivity
    Knowles, Charles H.
    Thin, Noel
    Gill, Katherine
    Bhan, Chetan
    Grimmer, Karyn
    Lunniss, Peter J.
    Williams, Norman S.
    Scott, S. Mark
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (04) : 643 - 649
  • [3] Bacterial colonization of stimulation electrode wires in patients undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation
    Dudding, T.
    Vaizey, C.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [4] The Effect of sacral nerve stimulation on uterine activity: a pilot study
    Govaert, B.
    Melenhorst, J.
    Link, G.
    Hoogland, H.
    van Gemert, W.
    Baeten, C.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (05) : 448 - 451
  • [5] Effects of temporary sacral nerve stimulation on gastrointestinal motility and function in patients with chronic refractory slow-transit constipation
    Altomare, D. F.
    Picciariello, A.
    Di Ciaula, A.
    Rinaldi, M.
    De Fazio, M.
    Portincasa, P.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (03) : 291 - 297
  • [6] Effects of 1-week sacral nerve stimulation on the rectal intestinal epithelial barrier and neuromuscular transmission in a porcine model
    Provost, M.
    Bregeon, J.
    Aubert, P.
    Duchalais-Dassonneville, E.
    D'Aldebert, E.
    Vergnolle, N.
    Neunlist, M.
    Meurette, G.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2015, 27 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [7] Insertion under local anaesthetic of temporary electrodes for sacral nerve stimulation testing is reliable and cost effective
    Mitchell, P. J.
    Cattle, K.
    Saravanathan, S.
    Telford, K. J.
    Kiff, E. S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (04) : 445 - 448
  • [8] Sacral nerve stimulation and rectal function: results of a prospective study in faecal incontinence
    Roman, S.
    Tatagiba, T.
    Damon, H.
    Barth, X.
    Mion, F.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2008, 20 (10) : 1127 - 1131
  • [9] Rectal motility after sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
    Michelsen, H. B.
    Worsoe, J.
    Krogh, K.
    Lundby, L.
    Christensen, P.
    Buntzen, S.
    Laurberg, S.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2010, 22 (01) : 36 - E6
  • [10] Temporary sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence owing to rectal hyposensitivity: A prospective, double-blind study
    Madbouly, Khaled M.
    Hussein, Ahmed M.
    SURGERY, 2015, 157 (01) : 56 - 63