Impact of neoadjuvant therapy of perioperative morbidity in patients with esophageal cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Imdahl, A [1 ]
Schöffel, U [1 ]
Ruf, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
esophageal cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; postoperative morbidity; response;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.12.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Conflicting results of preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer have been obtained; only patients with a complete pathological response seem to benefit from this therapy. However, there is evidence that preoperative radiochemotherapy leads to considerable postoperative morbidity. Therefore, postoperative morbidity was retrospectively investigated in 82 patients with an esophageal cancer who received preoperative radiochemotherapy. Methods: One hundred twenty-two consecutively operated on patients were included (1991 to 2001). Preoperative radiochemotherapy was initiated in 1994 for cT > 1, cNx, cM0 regardless of histology (n = 82); 36 Gy was applied (1.8 Gy daily, days 1 to 5, weeks 1 to 4), concurrently 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2) days 1 to 5, weeks 1 to 4), and cisplatin (20 mk/m days 1 to 5, weeks 1 and 4). Postoperative morbidity was categorized as surgery-and nonsurgery-related morbidity. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results were stratified into histology and compared with patients who were operated on only (n = 40). Results: Complete pathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy was achieved in 22%. An increase in surgery-related morbidity was observed after preoperative radiochemotherapy due to lesion of recurrent nerve (38% versus 12.5%, P = 0.009), as well as a marked difference in pulmonary morbidity (57% versus 37.5%, P = 0.05). The proportion of combined morbidity was increased after preoperative radiochemotherapy (49.4% versus 15%, P = 0.02), which led to a considerable prolongation of postoperative hospital stay (33 versus 21 days median, P = 0.0022). Patients with a longer postoperative hospital stay (>30 days; 43.2%) lived significantly shorter than patients with a shorter postoperative hospital stay (56.8%, P = 0.001). There was no statistical survival benefit in the neoadjuvant treated group. However, calculation of long-term survival revealed a significant survival advantage in patients with squamous cell cancer and a complete pathological response compared with patients without response (median 642 days versus 302, P = 0.026). Conclusions: Perioperative morbidity was significantly increased after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Long-term survival was clearly affected by the length of postoperative stay. Therefore, we need better patient selection for application of preoperative radiochemotherapy. (C) 2004 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 68
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Current Status of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
    Lin, Daniel
    Leichman, Lawrence
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 26 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [32] Apoptotic and proliferative indexes in esophageal cancer: Predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy apoptosis and proliferation in esophageal cancer
    Beardsmore, DA
    Verbeke, CS
    Davies, CL
    Guillou, PJ
    Clark, GWB
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (01) : 77 - 86
  • [33] Apoptotic and proliferative indexes in esophageal cancer: Predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy apoptosis and proliferation in esophageal cancer
    Duncan M. Beardsmore
    Caroline S. Verbeke
    Claire L. Davies
    Pierre J. Guillou
    Geoffrey W. B. Clark
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003, 7 : 77 - 87
  • [34] Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer
    He, Yunlong
    Zhao, Yaqi
    Akhtar, Muhammad Luqman
    Li, Yu
    Mingyan, E.
    Nie, Huan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (03): : 1258 - 1277
  • [35] Neoadjuvant irinotecan, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy with celecoxib for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer
    James M. Cleary
    Harvey J. Mamon
    Jackie Szymonifka
    Raphael Bueno
    Noah Choi
    Dean M. Donahue
    Panos M. Fidias
    Henning A. Gaissert
    Michael T. Jaklitsch
    Matthew H. Kulke
    Thomas P. Lynch
    Steven J. Mentzer
    Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
    Richard S. Swanson
    John Wain
    Charles S. Fuchs
    Peter C. Enzinger
    BMC Cancer, 16
  • [36] Esophageal surgical Apgar score (eSAS): A predictor for postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy
    Wang, Qin
    Zhang, Chi
    Qi, Chen
    Qiang, Yong
    Zhang, Zheng
    Xu, Fei
    Shen, Yi
    THORACIC CANCER, 2024, 15 (10) : 755 - 763
  • [37] Predicting the Response of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma: an In-depth Literature Review
    Tao, Chang-Juan
    Lin, Gang
    Xu, Ya-Ping
    Mao, Wei-Min
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 6 (11): : 1179 - 1186
  • [38] Pilot Prehabilitation Program for Patients With Esophageal Cancer During Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery
    Dewberry, Lindel C.
    Wingrove, Lisa J.
    Marsh, Megan D.
    Glode, Ashley E.
    Schefter, Tracey E.
    Leong, Stephen
    Purcell, William T.
    McCarter, Martin D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 235 : 66 - 72
  • [39] Neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer -: What can we accept.?
    Kral, Vladimir
    Neoral, Cestmir
    Aujesky, Rene
    Havlik, Roman
    Klein, Jiri
    Hajduch, Marian
    Svebisova, Hana
    Benes, Petr
    Vrba, Radek
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 53 (71) : 720 - 722
  • [40] Risk Factors for Muscle Loss During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Miyata, Kazushi
    Fukaya, Masahide
    Sugita, Shizuki
    Ebata, Tomoki
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (03) : 1309 - 1315