Framing ecosystem services: Affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning?

被引:53
|
作者
Opdam, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Coninx, Ingrid [3 ]
Dewulf, Art [4 ]
Steingrover, Eveliene [2 ]
Vos, Claire [2 ]
van der Wal, Merel [5 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Spatial Planning Grp, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Alterra Wageningen UR, Team Nat & Soc, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Alterra Wageningen, Team Reg Dev & Sustainable Land Use, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Wageningen Univ, Publ Adm & Policy Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Management Sci & Technol, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Green infrastructure; Actor behaviour; Attitudes and values; Governance by information; Community-based environmental planning; Ecosystem services; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTION; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of ecosystem services shifts the human-nature relationship from a conservation-oriented into a utility-oriented one. Advocates of the concept assume that it can alter the attitude and behaviour of human actors with respect to nature. The ecosystem services concept has so far received little attention in scientific literature about collaborative landscape planning. Consequently the potential of information about ecosystem services to influence landscape planning processes is unknown. In this paper we address the impact of different storylines about ecosystem services on actor behaviour. In these storylines, we distinguish three frames on ecosystem services: a social-cultural frame (emphasizing social-cultural services), an economic frame (emphasizing production services) and a sustainability frame (highlighting regulation services). We propose a conceptual framework in which we connect the concept of framing to attitudinal, sender-receiver and contextual factors. The framework is illustrated by a spatial planning experiment with academic students and by a case of collaborative landscape planning. The student experiment illustrates how attitudinal factors may intervene in the impact frames on actor behaviour. The case analysis shows how researchers who facilitated collaborative landscape planning used various frames as they attempted to build up the actor network to create collaborative relations in different phases of the planning process. The significance of our paper is that we provide an approach to investigate how information on ecosystem service benefits is processed by multiple actors in collaborative landscape planning processes. Our exploration implies that planners who facilitate a collaborative planning process have to be aware that purposively using ecosystem service frames stimulates engagement of actors with diverging backgrounds. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 231
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape
    Piras, Francesco
    Fiore, Beatrice
    Santoro, Antonio
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [42] Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem services in development planning: perspectives from a landscape level
    Sitas, Nadia
    Prozesky, Heidi E.
    Esler, Karen J.
    Reyers, Belinda
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2014, 29 (08) : 1315 - 1331
  • [43] Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities
    Loft, Lasse
    Mann, Carsten
    Hansjuergens, Bernd
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 150 - 157
  • [44] Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective
    Javier Babí Almenar
    Benedetto Rugani
    Davide Geneletti
    Tim Brewer
    Landscape Ecology, 2018, 33 : 2047 - 2059
  • [45] Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective
    Almenar, Javier Babi
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Geneletti, Davide
    Brewer, Tim
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2018, 33 (12) : 2047 - 2059
  • [46] Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
    de Groot, R. S.
    Alkemade, R.
    Braat, L.
    Hein, L.
    Willemen, L.
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 260 - 272
  • [47] Collaborative Landscape Planning: Co-Design of Ecosystem-Based Land Management Scenarios
    Karrasch, Leena
    Maier, Martin
    Kleyer, Michael
    Klenke, Thomas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (09)
  • [48] Linking ecosystem services with landscape history
    Matthias Bürgi
    Janet Silbernagel
    Jianguo Wu
    Felix Kienast
    Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30 : 11 - 20
  • [49] The social value of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the perspectives of different social actors
    Caceres, Daniel M.
    Tapella, Esteban
    Quetier, Fabien
    Diaz, Sandra
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [50] Ecosystem services from tropical forestry projects - The choice of international market actors
    Sell, Joachim
    Koellner, Thomas
    Weber, Olaf
    Proctor, Wendy
    Pedroni, Lucio
    Scholz, Roland W.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 9 (05) : 496 - 515