Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:28
|
作者
Bruendl, Johannes [1 ]
Lenart, Sebastian [2 ,3 ]
Stojanoski, Gjoko [4 ]
Gilfrich, Christian [4 ]
Rosenhammer, Bernd [1 ]
Stolzlechner, Michael [2 ]
Ponholzer, Anton [2 ]
Dreissig, Christina [5 ]
Weikert, Steffen [5 ]
Burger, Maximilian [1 ]
May, Matthias [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Urol, Caritas St Josef Med Ctr, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Hosp St John God, Dept Urol & Androl, Krankenhaus Barmherzigen Bruder Wien, Vienna, Austria
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Dept Urol & Androl, Salzburg, Austria
[4] St Elisabeth Hosp Straubing, Dept Urol, Straubing, Germany
[5] Vivantes Humboldt Hosp Berlin, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2020年 / 117卷 / 14期
关键词
LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; SYMPTOMATIC LYMPHOCELE; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; EXTRAPERITONEAL; CANCER; GUIDELINES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lymphocele is the most common complication arising after pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in the setting of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The only data available until now on the utility of a peritoneal flap to prevent lymphocele were retrospectively acquired. Methods: A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial with blinded assessment of endpoints was carried out on 232 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RARP with PLND. The patients in the intervention group were given a peritoneal flap; in the control group, surgery was performed without this modification. The two joint primary endpoints were the rates of symptomatic lymphocele during the same hospitalization as the operative procedure (iT1) and within 90 days of surgery (iT2). The secondary endpoints were lymphocele volume, the need for treatment of lymphocele, complications requiring an intervention, and the degree of postoperative stress incontinence. German Clinical Trials Register number: DRKS00011115. Results: The data were evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis, which, in this trial, was identical to an as-treated analysis. 108 patients (46.6%) were allotted to the intervention group. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences with respect to any clinical or histopathological criteria. A median of 16 lymph nodes were removed (interquartile range, 11-21). A symptomatic lymphocele arose in 1.3% (iT1) and 9.1% (iT2) of the patients, without any statistically significant difference between the two trial groups (p = 0.599 and p = 0.820, respectively). Nor did the groups differ significantly with respect to lymphocele volume (p = 0.670 on hospital discharge [T1], p = 0.650 90 days after surgery [T2]) or the type and frequency of need for subsequent surgical intervention (p = 0.535; iT2). 81.5% of all patients (n = 189) had no complications at all in the first three months after surgery. Nor were there any intergroup differences at 90 days with respect to the degree of stress urinary incontinence (p = 0.306) or complications (p = 0.486). Conclusion: A peritoneal flap after RARP was not found to influence the rate of postoperative lymphocele, whether asymptomatic or requiring treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (05): : 1515 - 1515
  • [2] The effect of peritoneal flap fixation on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Goezen, A. S.
    Senel, S.
    Koudonas, A.
    Rassweiler, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S933 - S933
  • [3] Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Wagner, Christian
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Joern H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 483 - 497
  • [4] ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Hosseini, Abolfazl
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 : A37 - A37
  • [5] The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Gozen, Ali Serdar
    Senel, Samet
    Koudonas, Antonios
    Dal Moro, Fabrizio
    Rassweiler, Jens
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2024,
  • [6] Impact of peritoneal bladder flap in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients on lymphoceles: a prospective randomised trial
    Pose, Randi M.
    Knipper, S.
    Beyer, B.
    Hohenhorst, L.
    Haese, A.
    Heinzer, H.
    Salomon, G.
    Steuber, T.
    Budaeus, L.
    Tilki, D.
    Isbarn, H.
    Maurer, T.
    Tennstedt, P.
    Graefen, M.
    Michl, U.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 43 (01)
  • [7] Port site and peritoneal metastases after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Acar, Omer
    Esen, Tank
    Bavbek, Sevil
    Peker, Onder
    Musaoglu, Ahmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2014, 5 (03): : 131 - 134
  • [8] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and a parachute
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Menon, Mani
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 820 - +
  • [9] Anatomic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Joseph, J. V.
    Capello, S. A.
    Patel, H. P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 339 - 339
  • [10] The Case for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I.
    Rao, Sandhya
    Ramanathan, Rajan
    Leung, Robert
    Mandhani, Anil
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (09) : 2039 - 2043