Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions

被引:45
|
作者
Kamal, Rasha Mohamed [1 ]
Helal, Maha Hussien [2 ]
Wessam, Rasha [1 ]
Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud [1 ]
Godda, Iman [3 ]
Alieldin, Nelly [4 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Dept Radiol, Kasr ElAiny Hosp, Womens Imaging Unit, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Radiol, Natl Canc Inst, Breast Imaging Unit, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Cairo Univ, Dept Pathol, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Cairo Univ, Dept Stat, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Digital mammography; Contrast enhanced spectral mammography; Breast lesions; Morphology lexicon; MR; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and to assess their impact on the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Materials and method: This ethics committee approved study included 168 consecutive patients with 211 breast lesions over 18 months. Lesions classified as non-enhancing and enhancing and then the latter group was subdivided into mass and non-mass. Mass lesions descriptors included: shape, margins, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. Non-mass lesions descriptors included: distribution, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. The impact of each descriptor on diagnosis individually assessed using Chi test and the validity compared in both benign and malignant lesions. The overall performance of CESM were also calculated. Results: The study included 102 benign (48.3%) and 109 malignant (51.7%) lesions. Enhancement was encountered in 1451211(68.7%) lesions. They further classified into enhancing mass (991145,68.3%) and non-mass lesions (461145, 31.7%). Contrast uptake was significantly more frequent in malignant breast lesions (p value <0.001). Irregular mass lesions with intense and heterogeneous enhancement patterns correlated with a malignant pathology (p value <0.001). CESM showed an overall sensitivity of 88.99% and specificity of 83.33%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.34 and 0.13 respectively. Conclusion: The assessment of the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on CESM enhances the performance of digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1055
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can contrast-enhanced mammography replace dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of sonomammographic indeterminate breast lesions?
    Rasha Mohamed Kamal
    Mennatallah Mohamed Hanafy
    Sahar Mahmoud Mansour
    Maher Hassan
    Mohamed Mohamed Gomaa
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51
  • [32] Can contrast-enhanced mammography replace dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of sonomammographic indeterminate breast lesions?
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Hanafy, Mennatallah Mohamed
    Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud
    Hassan, Maher
    Gomaa, Mohamed Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01):
  • [33] The feasibility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography immediately after contrast-enhanced CT
    Okada, Nobuko
    Tatsugami, Fuminari
    Sugai, Mai
    Okita, Izumi
    Ito, Mitsuya
    Ohtani, Shoichiro
    Ichimura, Kouichi
    Urashima, Masaki
    Awai, Kazuo
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (03) : 277 - 282
  • [34] The feasibility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography immediately after contrast-enhanced CT
    Nobuko Okada
    Fuminari Tatsugami
    Mai Sugai
    Izumi Okita
    Mitsuya Ito
    Shoichiro Ohtani
    Kouichi Ichimura
    Masaki Urashima
    Kazuo Awai
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 277 - 282
  • [35] Role of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in the evaluation of breast lesions
    Chen, R.
    Chong, B. K.
    Chotai, N.
    Tan, E. Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 200 : 21 - 21
  • [36] Structured reports for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Alvarez Sanchez, C.
    Arizaga Ramirez, M. C.
    Montes Fernandez, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2022, 64 : 98 - 105
  • [37] Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography
    Hauth, EAM
    Stockamp, C
    Maderwald, S
    Mühler, A
    Kimmig, R
    Jaeger, H
    Barkhausen, J
    Forsting, M
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2006, 30 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [38] Comparative Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Phillips, Jordana
    Mihai, Georgeta
    Hassonjee, Sarah Esaa
    Raj, Sean D.
    Palmer, Matthew R.
    Brook, Alexander
    Zhang, Da
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (04) : 839 - 846
  • [39] Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Wang, YongMei
    Fan, Wei
    Zhao, Song
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Li
    Zhang, Ping
    Ma, Rong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [40] Breast Cancer Supplemental Screening: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography or Contrast-Enhanced MRI?
    Rashidi, Ali
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Sadigh, Gelareh
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (04)