Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions

被引:47
作者
Kamal, Rasha Mohamed [1 ]
Helal, Maha Hussien [2 ]
Wessam, Rasha [1 ]
Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud [1 ]
Godda, Iman [3 ]
Alieldin, Nelly [4 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Dept Radiol, Kasr ElAiny Hosp, Womens Imaging Unit, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Radiol, Natl Canc Inst, Breast Imaging Unit, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Cairo Univ, Dept Pathol, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Cairo Univ, Dept Stat, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Digital mammography; Contrast enhanced spectral mammography; Breast lesions; Morphology lexicon; MR; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and to assess their impact on the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Materials and method: This ethics committee approved study included 168 consecutive patients with 211 breast lesions over 18 months. Lesions classified as non-enhancing and enhancing and then the latter group was subdivided into mass and non-mass. Mass lesions descriptors included: shape, margins, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. Non-mass lesions descriptors included: distribution, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. The impact of each descriptor on diagnosis individually assessed using Chi test and the validity compared in both benign and malignant lesions. The overall performance of CESM were also calculated. Results: The study included 102 benign (48.3%) and 109 malignant (51.7%) lesions. Enhancement was encountered in 1451211(68.7%) lesions. They further classified into enhancing mass (991145,68.3%) and non-mass lesions (461145, 31.7%). Contrast uptake was significantly more frequent in malignant breast lesions (p value <0.001). Irregular mass lesions with intense and heterogeneous enhancement patterns correlated with a malignant pathology (p value <0.001). CESM showed an overall sensitivity of 88.99% and specificity of 83.33%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.34 and 0.13 respectively. Conclusion: The assessment of the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on CESM enhances the performance of digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1055
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Dromain C, 2010, MED RADIOL DIAGN IMA, P187, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-78450-0_12
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Adler, Ghazal
    Garbay, Jean Remi
    Delaloge, Suzette
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [3] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size
    Fallenberg, E. M.
    Dromain, C.
    Diekmann, F.
    Engelken, F.
    Krohn, M.
    Singh, J. M.
    Ingold-Heppner, B.
    Winzer, K. J.
    Bick, U.
    Renz, D. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 256 - 264
  • [4] Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging
    Hill, Melissa L.
    Mainprize, James G.
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Muller, Serge
    Ebrahimi, Mehran
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience
    Jong, RA
    Yaffe, MJ
    Skarpathiotakis, M
    Shumak, RS
    Danjoux, NM
    Gunesekara, A
    Plewes, DB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) : 842 - 850
  • [6] Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations
    Kolb, TM
    Lichy, J
    Newhouse, JH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) : 165 - 175
  • [7] Lewin JM, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V221, P339
  • [8] Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: Interpretation and imaging pitfalls
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Ouwerkerk, Ronald
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Bluemke, David A.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (06) : 1719 - 1734
  • [9] Illustrated breast MR lexicon
    Morris, EA
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 36 (03) : 238 - 249
  • [10] Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model
    Nunes, LW
    Schnall, MD
    Orel, SG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) : 484 - 494