Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions

被引:45
|
作者
Kamal, Rasha Mohamed [1 ]
Helal, Maha Hussien [2 ]
Wessam, Rasha [1 ]
Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud [1 ]
Godda, Iman [3 ]
Alieldin, Nelly [4 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Dept Radiol, Kasr ElAiny Hosp, Womens Imaging Unit, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Radiol, Natl Canc Inst, Breast Imaging Unit, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Cairo Univ, Dept Pathol, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Cairo Univ, Dept Stat, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Digital mammography; Contrast enhanced spectral mammography; Breast lesions; Morphology lexicon; MR; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and to assess their impact on the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Materials and method: This ethics committee approved study included 168 consecutive patients with 211 breast lesions over 18 months. Lesions classified as non-enhancing and enhancing and then the latter group was subdivided into mass and non-mass. Mass lesions descriptors included: shape, margins, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. Non-mass lesions descriptors included: distribution, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. The impact of each descriptor on diagnosis individually assessed using Chi test and the validity compared in both benign and malignant lesions. The overall performance of CESM were also calculated. Results: The study included 102 benign (48.3%) and 109 malignant (51.7%) lesions. Enhancement was encountered in 1451211(68.7%) lesions. They further classified into enhancing mass (991145,68.3%) and non-mass lesions (461145, 31.7%). Contrast uptake was significantly more frequent in malignant breast lesions (p value <0.001). Irregular mass lesions with intense and heterogeneous enhancement patterns correlated with a malignant pathology (p value <0.001). CESM showed an overall sensitivity of 88.99% and specificity of 83.33%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.34 and 0.13 respectively. Conclusion: The assessment of the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on CESM enhances the performance of digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1055
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BIRADS 4 breast lesions: comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yasin R.
    El Ghany E.A.
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50 (1):
  • [2] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging
    Lancaster, Rachael B.
    Gulla, Shannon
    De Los Santos, Jennifer
    Umphrey, Heidi R.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [3] Evaluatıon of contrast enhancement intensity, pattern, and kinetics of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Bekircavusoglu, Ayse Fusun
    Kul, Sibel
    Bekircavusoglu, Suleyman
    Atasoy, Dilara
    Erkan, Merve
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2025, 56 (01):
  • [4] Differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions at conventional mammography: Role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography
    Grandinetti, ML
    Squillaci, E
    Botti, C
    Ciolfi, MG
    Crecco, M
    Simonetti, G
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 48 - 48
  • [5] Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Screening Multifocal and Multicentric Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients
    Feng, Lei
    Sheng, Lei
    Zhang, Litao
    Li, Na
    Xie, Yuanzhong
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 2022
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Wong, Christopher Yung Yuen
    Lee, Shu Yi Sonia
    Mahmood, Rameysh Danovani
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 65 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [7] Use of contrast-enhanced mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer
    Fischer, Uwe
    Diekmann, Felix
    Helbich, Thomas
    Preibsch, Heike
    Puesken, Michael
    Wenkel, Evelyn
    Wienbeck, Susanne
    Fallenberg, Eva Maria
    RADIOLOGIE, 2023, 63 (12): : 916 - 924
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A potential exclusion diagnosis modality in dense breast patients
    Qin, Yun
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Xueqin
    Zhao, Shuang
    Zhong, Huanhuan
    Huang, Juan
    Yu, Jianqun
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08): : 2653 - 2659
  • [9] Role of the contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the diagnosis of breast metastases from extramammary neoplasms
    La Forgia, Daniele
    Catino, Annamaria
    Dentamaro, Rosalba
    Galetta, Domenico
    Gatta, Gianluca
    Losurdo, Liliana
    Massafra, Raffaella
    Scattone, Anna
    Tangaro, Sabina
    Fanizzi, Annarita
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (04): : 1360 - 1366
  • [10] Multiview multimodal network for breast cancer diagnosis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images
    Song, Jingqi
    Zheng, Yuanjie
    Zakir Ullah, Muhammad
    Wang, Junxia
    Jiang, Yanyun
    Xu, Chenxi
    Zou, Zhenxing
    Ding, Guocheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2021, 16 (06) : 979 - 988