High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer: Oncological outcome and toxicity analysis of 4 fractionation schemes

被引:11
作者
le Guyader, Maud [1 ]
Kee, Daniel Lam Cham [2 ]
Thamphya, Brice [3 ]
Schiappa, Renaud [3 ]
Gautier, Mathieu [1 ]
Chand-Fouche, Marie-Eve [1 ]
Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote dAzur, Dept Radiat Oncol, Antoine Lacassagne Canc Ctr, 33 Ave Valombrose, F-06189 Nice 2, France
[2] Pale Sante Republ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] Univ Cote dAzur, Antoine Lacassagne Canc Ctr, Dept Stat, Nice, France
关键词
Cervical cancer; Brachytherapy; High-dose-rate; Fractionation scheme; GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; RATE INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY; SOCIETY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; WORKING GROUP; AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY; ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; VOLUME PARAMETERS; TREATMENT TIME; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctro.2021.10.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Brachytherapy (BT) boost after radio-chemotherapy (RCT) is a standard of care in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). As there is no consensus on high-dose-rate (HDR) BT fractionation schemes, our aim was to report the oncological outcome and toxicity profile of four different schemes using twice-a-day (BID) HDR-BT. Patients and methods: This was an observational, retrospective, single institution study for patients with LACC receiving a HDR-BT boost. The latter was performed with a single implant and single imaging done on day 1. The different fractionation schemes were: 7 Gy + 4x3.5 Gy (group 1); 7 Gy + 4x4.5 Gy (group 2); 3x7Gy (group 3) and 3x8Gy (group 4). Local (LFS), nodal (NFS) and metastatic (MFS) recurrence-free survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Acute (<= 6 months) and late toxicities (>6 months) were reported. Results: From 2007 to 2018, 191 patients were included. Median follow-up was 57 months [45-132] and median EQD2(10)D(90)CTV(HR) was 84, 82 and 90 Gy for groups 2, 3 and 4 respectively (dosimetric data missing for group 1). The 5-year LFS, NFS, MFS, PFS and OS were 85% [81-90], 83% [79-86], 70% [67-73], 61% [57-64] and 75% [69-78] respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. EQD2(10)D(90)CTV(HR) < 85 Gy was a prognostic factor for local recurrence in univariate analysis (p = 0.045). The rates of acute/late grade = 2 urinary, digestive and gynecological toxicities were 9%/15%, 3%/15% and 9%/25% respectively. Conclusion: Bi-fractionated HDR-BT boost seems feasible with good oncological outcome and slightly more toxicity after dose escalation.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A novel two-step optimization method for tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Sharma, Manju
    Fields, Emma C.
    Todor, Dorin A.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (05) : 613 - 618
  • [42] High-dose-rate brachytherapy using inverse planning optimization with tandem and ovoid applicators for locally advanced cervical cancer: a simulation study
    Yuji Yaegashi
    Kohei Sasaki
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2021, 14 : 262 - 270
  • [43] Image guided radiation therapy boost in combination with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer
    Wang, Xianliang
    Li, Jie
    Wang, Pei
    Yuan, Ke
    Yin, Gang
    Wan, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 8 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [44] Outcomes of High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Long-term Results
    Pinn-Bingham, Melva
    Puthawala, Ajmel A.
    Syed, A. M. Nisar
    Sharma, Anil
    DiSaia, Philip
    Berman, Michael
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    Randall-Whitis, Leslie
    Mahmood, Usama
    Ramsinghani, Nilam
    Kuo, Jeffrey
    Chen, Wen-Pin
    McLaren, Christine E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (03): : 714 - 720
  • [45] Patients' experiences of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer using an inpatient protocol
    Hruby, George
    Chen, James Y.
    Bucci, Joseph
    Loadsman, John A.
    Perry, Penelope
    Stockler, Martin R.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2011, 10 (05) : 395 - 400
  • [46] Endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer
    Taggar, Amandeep S.
    Pitter, Kenneth L.
    Cohen, Gil'ad N.
    Schattner, Mark
    Gerdes, Hans
    Markowitz, Arnold J.
    Ilson, David
    Brady, Paul
    Cuaron, John J.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Wu, Abraham J.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 17 (03) : 621 - 627
  • [47] Use of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Kuehne, J
    Kleisli, T
    Biernacki, P
    Girvigian, M
    Streeter, O
    Corman, ML
    Ortega, AE
    Vukasin, P
    Essani, R
    Beart, RW
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (07) : 895 - 899
  • [48] Implant time and process efficiency for CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Mayadev, Jyoti
    Qi, Lihong
    Lentz, Susan
    Benedict, Stanley
    Courquin, Jean
    Dieterich, Sonja
    Mathai, Mathew
    Stern, Robin
    Valicenti, Richard
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2014, 13 (03) : 233 - 239
  • [49] Combination external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: Analysis of dose and fractionation schedule
    Toita, T
    Kakinohana, Y
    Ogawa, K
    Adachi, G
    Moromizato, H
    Nagai, Y
    Maehama, T
    Sakumoto, K
    Kanazawa, K
    Murayama, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05): : 1344 - 1353
  • [50] Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: Efficacy and toxicity of a low cumulative radiation dose schedule
    Toita, Takafumi
    Kitagawa, Ryo
    Hamano, Tetsutaro
    Umayahara, Kenji
    Hirashima, Yasuyuki
    Aoki, Yoichi
    Oguchi, Masahiko
    Mikami, Mikio
    Takizawa, Ken
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 126 (02) : 211 - 216