High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer: Oncological outcome and toxicity analysis of 4 fractionation schemes

被引:11
|
作者
le Guyader, Maud [1 ]
Kee, Daniel Lam Cham [2 ]
Thamphya, Brice [3 ]
Schiappa, Renaud [3 ]
Gautier, Mathieu [1 ]
Chand-Fouche, Marie-Eve [1 ]
Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote dAzur, Dept Radiat Oncol, Antoine Lacassagne Canc Ctr, 33 Ave Valombrose, F-06189 Nice 2, France
[2] Pale Sante Republ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] Univ Cote dAzur, Antoine Lacassagne Canc Ctr, Dept Stat, Nice, France
关键词
Cervical cancer; Brachytherapy; High-dose-rate; Fractionation scheme; GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; RATE INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY; SOCIETY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; WORKING GROUP; AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY; ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; VOLUME PARAMETERS; TREATMENT TIME; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctro.2021.10.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Brachytherapy (BT) boost after radio-chemotherapy (RCT) is a standard of care in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). As there is no consensus on high-dose-rate (HDR) BT fractionation schemes, our aim was to report the oncological outcome and toxicity profile of four different schemes using twice-a-day (BID) HDR-BT. Patients and methods: This was an observational, retrospective, single institution study for patients with LACC receiving a HDR-BT boost. The latter was performed with a single implant and single imaging done on day 1. The different fractionation schemes were: 7 Gy + 4x3.5 Gy (group 1); 7 Gy + 4x4.5 Gy (group 2); 3x7Gy (group 3) and 3x8Gy (group 4). Local (LFS), nodal (NFS) and metastatic (MFS) recurrence-free survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Acute (<= 6 months) and late toxicities (>6 months) were reported. Results: From 2007 to 2018, 191 patients were included. Median follow-up was 57 months [45-132] and median EQD2(10)D(90)CTV(HR) was 84, 82 and 90 Gy for groups 2, 3 and 4 respectively (dosimetric data missing for group 1). The 5-year LFS, NFS, MFS, PFS and OS were 85% [81-90], 83% [79-86], 70% [67-73], 61% [57-64] and 75% [69-78] respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. EQD2(10)D(90)CTV(HR) < 85 Gy was a prognostic factor for local recurrence in univariate analysis (p = 0.045). The rates of acute/late grade = 2 urinary, digestive and gynecological toxicities were 9%/15%, 3%/15% and 9%/25% respectively. Conclusion: Bi-fractionated HDR-BT boost seems feasible with good oncological outcome and slightly more toxicity after dose escalation.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concomitant cervical and transperineal parametrial high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Bailleux, Caroline
    Falk, Alexander Tuan
    Chand-Fouche, Marie-Eve
    Gautier, Mathieu
    Barranger, Emmanuel
    Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 8 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [2] High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Comparison of three different fractionation schemes
    Falk, Alexander T.
    Demontoy, Sylvain
    Chamorey, Emmanuel
    Chand, Marie-Eve
    Gautier, Mathieu
    Azria, David
    Zaki, Sara
    Chevallier, Daniel
    Kee, Daniel Lam Cham
    Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (05) : 993 - 999
  • [3] HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST FOR PROSTATE CANCER: COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT FRACTIONATION SCHEMES
    Kaprealian, Tanta
    Weinberg, Vivian
    Speight, Joycelyn L.
    Gottschalk, Alexander R.
    Roach, Mack, III
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Hsu, I. -Chow
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (01): : 222 - 227
  • [4] Clinical outcomes of abbreviated high dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: lessons from the COVID pandemic for high dose-rate fractionation
    Chopra, Supriya
    Samanta, Asesh
    Nagar, Arunima
    Mittal, Prachi
    Gupta, Ankita
    Mulani, Jaahid
    Jain, Jeevanshu
    Kohle, Satish
    Ghadi, Yogesh
    Rath, Sushmita
    Gulia, Seema
    Ghosh, Jaya
    Gupta, Sudeep
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2025, 24 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [5] Bladder accumulated dose in image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer and its relation to urinary toxicity
    Zakariaee, Roja
    Hamarneh, Ghassan
    Brown, Colin J.
    Gaudet, Marc
    Aquino-Parsons, Christina
    Spadinger, Ingrid
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (24): : 8408 - 8424
  • [6] High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost in inoperable locally advanced tongue carcinoma
    Angel Santos, Miguel
    Luis Guinot, Jose
    Isabel Tortajada, Maria
    Santamaria, Paula
    Campo, Valentin
    Oliver, Laura
    Pena, Marina
    Arribas, Leoncio
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (06) : 1213 - 1218
  • [7] High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Outcomes and genitourinary toxicity
    Bece, Andrej
    Patanjali, Nitya
    Jackson, Michael
    Whitaker, May
    Hruby, George
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (05) : 670 - 676
  • [8] Dose and fractionation regimen for brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer in the US
    Hsieh, Kristin
    Bloom, Julie R.
    Dickstein, Daniel R.
    Hsieh, Celina
    Marshall, Deborah
    Ghiassi-Nejad, Zahra
    Raince, Jagdeep
    Lymberis, Stella
    Chadha, Manjeet
    Gupta, Vishal
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 180 : 55 - 62
  • [9] Indian Brachytherapy Society Guidelines for radiotherapeutic management of cervical cancer with special emphasis on high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Gudi, Shivakumar
    Singh, Roshni
    Sasidharan, Ajay
    Sastri, Supriya
    Gurram, Lavanya
    Sharma, Dayanand
    Ganeshrajah, Selvaluxmy
    Janaki, M. G.
    Badakh, Dinesh
    Basu, Abhishek
    James, Francis
    Swamidas, Jamema, V
    Kuppuswamy, Thayalan
    Bhalavat, Rajendra
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (04) : 293 - 306
  • [10] Urethral dosimetry and toxicity with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer
    Rajagopalan, Malolan S.
    Kannan, Neeta
    Kim, Hayeon
    Houser, Christopher J.
    Beriwal, Sushil
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (03) : 248 - 253