The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Gang [2 ]
Pang, Yao [2 ]
Wang, Wenhao [2 ]
Zhang, Hongyi [2 ]
Tuo, Guangxin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zequan [2 ]
Zhu, Zijiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Clin Med, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; protocol; thoracic cancers; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOMICS; IMAGES; CT; FEATURES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers.Methods and analysis:We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42019135247
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of artificial intelligence model for infectious keratitis classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sarayar, Randy
    Lestari, Yeni Dwi
    Setio, Arnaud A. A.
    Sitompul, Ratna
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [42] The accuracy of artificial intelligence in predicting COVID-19 patient mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu Xin
    Hongxu Li
    Yuxin Zhou
    Qing Yang
    Wenjing Mu
    Han Xiao
    Zipeng Zhuo
    Hongyu Liu
    Hongying Wang
    Xutong Qu
    Changsong Wang
    Haitao Liu
    Kaijiang Yu
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [43] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Yanli
    Qiao, Haiyan
    Lian, Zhaoan
    Li, Chunlin
    Xiang, Yi
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (15) : E29083
  • [44] Use of artificial intelligence in obstetric and gynaecological diagnostics: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chaurasia, Anjalee
    Curry, Georgia
    Zhao, Yi
    Dawoodbhoy, Fatema
    Green, Jennifer
    Vaninetti, Matilde
    Shah, Nishel
    Greer, Orene
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [45] Diagnostic accuracy of smartphone-based artificial intelligence systems for detecting diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hasan, S. Umar
    Siddiqui, M. A. Rehman
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 205
  • [46] Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray and CT using artificial intelligence for osteoporosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yamamoto, Norio
    Shiroshita, Akihiro
    Kimura, Ryota
    Kamo, Tomohiko
    Ogihara, Hirofumi
    Tsuge, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2024, 42 (05) : 483 - 491
  • [47] Impact of artificial intelligence on diagnosing eye diseases - A meta-analysis
    Alhazimi, Amro
    Almarek, Faisal
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2024, 14 (01) : 42 - 54
  • [48] Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bojsen, Jonas Asgaard
    Elhakim, Mohammad Talal
    Graumann, Ole
    Gaist, David
    Nielsen, Mads
    Harbo, Frederik Severin Grae
    Krag, Christian Hedeager
    Sagar, Malini Vendela
    Kruuse, Christina
    Boesen, Mikael Ploug
    Rasmussen, Benjamin Schnack Brandt
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [49] Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tavares Borges Mesquita, Germana de Queiroz
    Vieira, Walbert A.
    Campos Vidigal, Maria Tereza
    Nassif Travencolo, Bruno Augusto
    Beaini, Thiago Leite
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    Paranhos, Luiz Renato
    de Brito Junior, Rui Barbosa
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2023, 36 (03) : 1158 - 1179
  • [50] Applications of artificial intelligence in Orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Geda, M. W.
    Tang, Yuk Ming
    Lee, C. K. M.
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 133