The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Gang [2 ]
Pang, Yao [2 ]
Wang, Wenhao [2 ]
Zhang, Hongyi [2 ]
Tuo, Guangxin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zequan [2 ]
Zhu, Zijiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Clin Med, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; protocol; thoracic cancers; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOMICS; IMAGES; CT; FEATURES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers.Methods and analysis:We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42019135247
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Rib Fracture Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van den Broek, Marnix C. L.
    Buijs, Jorn H.
    Schmitz, Liselotte F. M.
    Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.
    SURGERIES, 2024, 5 (01): : 24 - 36
  • [42] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical diagnostic scoring systems for childhood tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Kakinda, Michael
    Olum, Ronald
    Baluku, Joseph Baruch
    Bongomin, Felix
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [43] Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lui, Thomas K. L.
    Guo, Chuan-Guo
    Leung, Wai K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (01) : 11 - +
  • [44] Accuracy of Ultrasound Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules Based on Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnostic Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xue, Yu
    Zhou, Ying
    Wang, Tingrui
    Chen, Huijuan
    Wu, Lingling
    Ling, Huayun
    Wang, Hong
    Qiu, Lijuan
    Ye, Dongqing
    Wang, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [45] Artificial intelligence for the prediction of acute kidney injury during the perioperative period: systematic review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Zhang, Hanfei
    Wang, Amanda Y.
    Wu, Shukun
    Ngo, Johnathan
    Feng, Yunlin
    He, Xin
    Zhang, Yingfeng
    Wu, Xingwei
    Hong, Daqing
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [46] Artificial intelligence for the prediction of acute kidney injury during the perioperative period: systematic review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Hanfei Zhang
    Amanda Y. Wang
    Shukun Wu
    Johnathan Ngo
    Yunlin Feng
    Xin He
    Yingfeng Zhang
    Xingwei Wu
    Daqing Hong
    BMC Nephrology, 23
  • [47] Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nazarian, Scarlet
    Glover, Ben
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    Teare, Julian
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (07)
  • [48] Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diabetic Retinopathy Detection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sesgundo III, Jaime Angeles
    Maeng, David Collin
    Tukay, Jumelle Aubrey
    Ascano, Maria Patricia
    Suba-Cohen, Justine
    Sampang, Virginia
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [49] Artificial intelligence in osteoarthritis detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Jahanshahi, Ali
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Zakavi, Seyed Sina
    Behrouzieh, Sadra
    Gouravani, Mahdi
    Guermazi, Ali
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 (03) : 241 - 253
  • [50] Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kuo, Rachel Y. L.
    Harrison, Conrad
    Curran, Terry-Ann
    Jones, Benjamin
    Freethy, Alexander
    Cussons, David
    Stewart, Max
    Collins, Gary S.
    Furniss, Dominic
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (01) : 50 - 62