The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Gang [2 ]
Pang, Yao [2 ]
Wang, Wenhao [2 ]
Zhang, Hongyi [2 ]
Tuo, Guangxin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zequan [2 ]
Zhu, Zijiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Clin Med, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; protocol; thoracic cancers; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOMICS; IMAGES; CT; FEATURES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers.Methods and analysis:We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42019135247
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diabetic Retinopathy Detection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sesgundo III, Jaime Angeles
    Maeng, David Collin
    Tukay, Jumelle Aubrey
    Ascano, Maria Patricia
    Suba-Cohen, Justine
    Sampang, Virginia
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [32] Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Compared to Histopathologic Examination in Assessment of Oral Cancer - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aditya, Amita
    Kore, Antara
    Patil, Shruti
    Vinay, Vineet
    Happy, Daisy
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE AND RADIOLOGY, 2023, 35 (04) : 593 - 598
  • [33] Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana
    Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
    Cazacu, Irina M.
    Florescu, Lucian Mihai
    Streba, Liliana
    Croitoru, Vlad M.
    Sur, Daniel
    Croitoru, Adina
    Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
    Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [34] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Harandi, Hamid
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Shojaei, Shayan
    Saleh, Ramy R.
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (04): : 1297 - 1311
  • [35] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting osteoporosis using dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khadivi, Gita
    Akhtari, Abtin
    Sharifi, Farshad
    Zargarian, Nicolette
    Esmaeili, Saharnaz
    Ahsaie, Mitra Ghazizadeh
    Shahbazi, Soheil
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [36] Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pakanat Decharatanachart
    Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
    Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai
    Sombat Treeprasertsuk
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [37] Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy for chronic atrophic gastritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Yanting
    Wei, Ning
    Wang, Kunhong
    Tao, Tao
    Yu, Feng
    Lv, Bing
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [38] The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoeboer, S. H.
    van der Geest, P. J.
    Nieboer, D.
    Groeneveld, A. B. J.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2015, 21 (05) : 474 - 481
  • [39] Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Lung Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Xiushan
    He, Bo
    Hu, Yunhai
    Ren, Min
    Chen, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Zhiguang
    Ma, Jun
    Ouyang, Lanwei
    Chu, Hongmei
    Gao, Huan
    He, Wenjing
    Liu, Tianhu
    Li, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10 : 938113
  • [40] Artificial intelligence predicts lung cancer radiotherapy response: A meta-analysis
    Xing, Wenmin
    Gao, Wenyan
    Lv, Xiaoling
    Zhao, Zhenlei
    Xu, Xiaogang
    Wu, Zhibing
    Mao, Genxiang
    Chen, Jun
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 142