The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Gang [2 ]
Pang, Yao [2 ]
Wang, Wenhao [2 ]
Zhang, Hongyi [2 ]
Tuo, Guangxin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zequan [2 ]
Zhu, Zijiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Clin Med, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; protocol; thoracic cancers; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOMICS; IMAGES; CT; FEATURES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:Thoracic diseases include a variety of common human primary malignant tumors, among which lung cancer and esophageal cancer are among the top 10 in cancer incidence and mortality. Early diagnosis is an important part of cancer treatment, so artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for the accurate and automated detection and diagnosis of thoracic tumors. However, the complicated AI structure and image processing made the diagnosis result of AI-based system unstable. The purpose of this study is to systematically review published evidence to explore the accuracy of AI systems in diagnosing thoracic cancers.Methods and analysis:We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems for the prediction of thoracic diseases. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic cancers, including assessing potential biases and calculating combined estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the factors associated with different models, classifiers, and radiomics information. We will search databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (via OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RevMan 5.3 and Meta-disc 1.4 software will be used for data synthesis. If pooling is appropriate, we will produce summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence intervals around the summary operating points. Methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42019135247
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for grading of ophthalmology imaging modalities
    Cao, Jessica
    Chang-Kit, Brittany
    Katsnelson, Glen
    Far, Parsa Merhraban
    Uleryk, Elizabeth
    Ogunbameru, Adeteju
    Miranda, Rafael N.
    Felfeli, Tina
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [2] Accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting tumor bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tao, Huimin
    Hui, Xu
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Zhu, Rongrong
    Wang, Ping
    Zhou, Sheng
    Yang, Kehu
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [3] Accuracy of ultrasonic artificial intelligence in diagnosing benign and malignant breast diseases A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Qiyu
    Qu, Meijing
    Sun, Lipeng
    Wang, Hui
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (50) : E28289
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in detection of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gouravani, Mahdi
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Shojaei, Shayan
    Mirakhori, Sina
    Harandi, Hamid
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Saleh, Ramy R.
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musleh, Ayman Mohammed
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
    Abid, Mohammad Naim
    Salem, Yahia
    Hamila, Haitham Mounir
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 69 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [6] Diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence-based imaging for lung cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thong, Lay Teng
    Chou, Hui Shan
    Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
    Lau, Ying
    LUNG CANCER, 2023, 176 : 4 - 13
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting gastrointestinal luminal pathologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parkash, Om
    Siddiqui, Asra Tus Saleha
    Jiwani, Uswa
    Rind, Fahad
    Padhani, Zahra Ali
    Rizvi, Arjumand
    Hoodbhoy, Zahra
    Das, Jai K.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [8] Artificial intelligence in antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive performance and diagnostic accuracy
    Pennisi, Flavia
    Pinto, Antonio
    Ricciardi, Giovanni Emanuele
    Signorelli, Carlo
    Gianfredi, Vincenza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2025, 44 (03) : 463 - 513
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Mcgenity, Clare
    Clarke, Emily L.
    Jennings, Charlotte
    Matthews, Gillian
    Cartlidge, Caroline
    Freduah-Agyemang, Henschel
    Stocken, Deborah D.
    Treanor, Darren
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [10] Artificial intelligence as diagnostic modality for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Afifah, Azzahra
    Syafira, Fara
    Afladhanti, Putri Mahirah
    Dharmawidiarini, Dini
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (02): : 296 - 303