Modelling the reliability of search and rescue operations with Bayesian Belief Networks

被引:61
作者
Norrington, Lisa [1 ]
Quigley, John [1 ]
Russell, Ashley [1 ]
Van der Meer, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow G1 1QE, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Bayesian Belief networks; statistical inference; elicitation; expert judgement; reliability modelling; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper uses a Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN) methodology to model the reliability of Search And Rescue (SAR) operations within UK Coastguard (Maritime Rescue) coordination centres. This is an extension of earlier work, which investigated the rationale of the government's decision to close a number of coordination centres. The previous study made use of secondary data sources and employed a binary logistic regression methodology to support the analysis. This study focused on the collection of primary data through a structured elicitation process, which resulted in the construction of a BBN. The main findings of the study are that statistical analysis of secondary data can be used to complement BBNs. The former provided a more objective assessment of associations between variables, but was restricted in the level of detail that could be explicitly expressed within the model due to a lack of available data. The latter method provided a much more detailed model, but the validity of the numeric assessments was more questionable. Each method can be used to inform and defend the development of the other. The paper describes in detail the elicitation process employed to construct the BBN and reflects on the potential for bias. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 949
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Insurability risk assessment of oil refineries using Bayesian Belief Networks
    Mkrtchyan, Lusine
    Straub, Ulrich
    Giachino, Massimo
    Kocher, Thomas
    Sansavini, Giovanni
    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2022, 74
  • [42] Introducing Dynamics in a Fault Diagnostic Application Using Bayesian Belief Networks
    Lampis, Mariapia
    Andrews, John
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY, VOLS I AND II: HIGHLY RELIABLE, EASY TO MAINTAIN AND READY TO SUPPORT, 2009, : 186 - 190
  • [43] Learning Bayesian networks using A* search with ancestral constraints
    Wang, Zidong
    Gao, Xiaoguang
    Tan, Xiangyuan
    Liu, Xiaohan
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 451 : 107 - 124
  • [44] Risk Assessment of Polar Drillship Operations Based on Bayesian Networks
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Zixin
    Li, Hongen
    Huang, Xiaoming
    Yue, Qianjin
    Yue, Xiufeng
    Wang, Yanlin
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [45] Bayesian Belief Networks: Redefining wholesale electricity price modelling in high penetration non-firm renewable generation power systems
    Maticka, Martin J.
    Mahmoud, Thair S.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 239
  • [46] An online platform for spatial and iterative modelling with Bayesian Networks
    Stritih, Ana
    Rabe, Sven-Erik
    Robaina, Orencio
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Celio, Enrico
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2020, 127
  • [47] Bayesian belief network modelling of chlorine disinfection for human pathogenic viruses in municipal wastewater
    Carvajal, Guido
    Roser, David J.
    Sisson, Scott A.
    Keegan, Alexandra
    Khan, Stuart J.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 109 : 144 - 154
  • [48] Applying Bayesian Belief Networks to Assess Alpine Grassland Degradation Risks: A Case Study in Northwest Sichuan, China
    Zhou, Shuang
    Peng, Li
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [49] A Framework for Assessing Disruptions in a Clinical Supply Chain Using Bayesian Belief Networks
    Rodgers, Mark
    Singham, Dashi
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 15 (03) : 467 - 481
  • [50] BAYES-HEP: Bayesian belief networks for estimation of human error probability
    M. Karthick
    C. Senthil Kumar
    T. Paul Robert
    Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 2017, 6 (3) : 187 - 197