Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing

被引:12
作者
Ura, Hiroki [1 ,2 ]
Togi, Sumihito [1 ,2 ]
Niida, Yo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Med Univ Hosp, Ctr Clin Genom, 1-1 Daigaku, Kahoku, Ishikawa 9200923, Japan
[2] Kanazawa Med Univ, Med Res Inst, Dept Adv Med, Div Genom Med, 1-1 Daigaku, Kahoku, Ishikawa 9200923, Japan
关键词
somatic variant detection; clinical sequencing; next generation sequencing; cancer gene panel testing; somatic variant caller; mosaic mutation; ENZYME MISMATCH CLEAVAGE; TUMOR; PERFORMANCE; DATABASE; DNA;
D O I
10.3390/ijms21103530
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cancer gene panel testing requires accurate detection of somatic mosaic mutations, as the test sample consists of a mixture of cancer cells and normal cells; each minor clone in the tumor also has different somatic mutations. Several studies have shown that the different types of software used for variant calling for next generation sequencing (NGS) can detect low-frequency somatic mutations. However, the accuracy of these somatic variant callers is unknown. We performed cancer gene panel testing in duplicate experiments using three different high-fidelity DNA polymerases in pre-capture amplification steps and analyzed by three different variant callers, Strelka2, Mutect2, and LoFreq. We selected six somatic variants that were detected in both experiments with more than two polymerases and by at least one variant caller. Among them, five single nucleotide variants were verified by CEL nuclease-mediated heteroduplex incision with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining (CHIPS) and Sanger sequencing. In silico analysis indicated that the FBXW7 and MAP3K1 missense mutations cause damage at the protein level. Comparing three somatic variant callers, we found that Strelka2 detected more variants than Mutect2 and LoFreq. We conclude that dual sequencing with Strelka2 analysis is useful for detection of accurate somatic mutations in cancer gene panel testing.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries
    Aird, Daniel
    Ross, Michael G.
    Chen, Wei-Sheng
    Danielsson, Maxwell
    Fennell, Timothy
    Russ, Carsten
    Jaffe, David B.
    Nusbaum, Chad
    Gnirke, Andreas
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2011, 12 (02)
  • [2] A comprehensive assessment of somatic mutation detection in cancer using whole-genome sequencing
    Alioto, Tyler S.
    Buchhalter, Ivo
    Derdak, Sophia
    Hutter, Barbara
    Eldridge, Matthew D.
    Hovig, Eivind
    Heisler, Lawrence E.
    Beck, Timothy A.
    Simpson, Jared T.
    Tonon, Laurie
    Sertier, Anne-Sophie
    Patch, Ann-Marie
    Jaeger, Natalie
    Ginsbach, Philip
    Drews, Ruben
    Paramasivam, Nagarajan
    Kabbe, Rolf
    Chotewutmontri, Sasithorn
    Diessl, Nicolle
    Previti, Christopher
    Schmidt, Sabine
    Brors, Benedikt
    Feuerbach, Lars
    Heinold, Michael
    Groebner, Susanne
    Korshunov, Andrey
    Tarpey, Patrick S.
    Butler, Adam P.
    Hinton, Jonathan
    Jones, David
    Menzies, Andrew
    Raine, Keiran
    Shepherd, Rebecca
    Stebbings, Lucy
    Teague, Jon W.
    Ribeca, Paolo
    Giner, Francesc Castro
    Beltran, Sergi
    Raineri, Emanuele
    Dabad, Marc
    Heath, Simon C.
    Gut, Marta
    Denroche, Robert E.
    Harding, Nicholas J.
    Yamaguchi, Takafumi N.
    Fujimoto, Akihiro
    Nakagawa, Hidewaki
    Quesada, Ctor
    Valdes-Mas, Rafael
    Nakken, Sigve
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
  • [3] Somatic mutation detection using various targeted detection assays in paired samples of circulating tumor DNA, primary tumor and metastases from patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases
    Beije, Nick
    Helmijr, Jean C.
    Weerts, Marjolein J. A.
    Beaufort, Corine M.
    Wiggin, Matthew
    Marziali, Andre
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Sleijfer, Stefan
    Jansen, Maurice P. H. M.
    Martens, John W. M.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2016, 10 (10): : 1575 - 1584
  • [4] Calling Variants in the Clinic: Informed Variant Calling Decisions Based on Biological, Clinical, and Laboratory Variables
    Bohannan, Zachary S.
    Mitrofanova, Antonina
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 : 561 - 569
  • [5] PCR-Induced Transitions Are the Major Source of Error in Cleaned Ultra-Deep Pyrosequencing Data
    Brodin, Johanna
    Mild, Mattias
    Hedskog, Charlotte
    Sherwood, Ellen
    Leitner, Thomas
    Andersson, Bjoern
    Albert, Jan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [6] In-depth comparison of somatic point mutation callers based on different tumor next-generation sequencing depth data
    Cai, Lei
    Yuan, Wei
    Zhang, Zhou
    He, Lin
    Chou, Kuo-Chen
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [7] Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples
    Cibulskis, Kristian
    Lawrence, Michael S.
    Carter, Scott L.
    Sivachenko, Andrey
    Jaffe, David
    Sougnez, Carrie
    Gabriel, Stacey
    Meyerson, Matthew
    Lander, Eric S.
    Getz, Gad
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [8] The variant call format and VCFtools
    Danecek, Petr
    Auton, Adam
    Abecasis, Goncalo
    Albers, Cornelis A.
    Banks, Eric
    DePristo, Mark A.
    Handsaker, Robert E.
    Lunter, Gerton
    Marth, Gabor T.
    Sherry, Stephen T.
    McVean, Gilean
    Durbin, Richard
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (15) : 2156 - 2158
  • [9] High-resolution mapping of DNA polymerase fidelity using nucleotide imbalances and next-generation sequencing
    de Paz, Alexandra M.
    Cybulski, Thaddeus R.
    Marblestone, Adam H.
    Zamft, Bradley M.
    Church, George M.
    Boyden, Edward S.
    Kording, Konrad P.
    Tyo, Keith E. J.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (13)
  • [10] Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing
    Dohm, Juliane C.
    Lottaz, Claudio
    Borodina, Tatiana
    Himmelbauer, Heinz
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (16)