A novel breast tissue density classification methodology

被引:171
作者
Oliver, Arnau [1 ]
Freixenet, Jordi [1 ]
Marti, Robert [1 ]
Pont, Josep [2 ]
Perez, Elsa [2 ]
Denton, Erika R. E. [3 ]
Zwiggelaar, Reyer [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Girona, Inst Informat & Applicat, Girona 17071, Spain
[2] Hosp Josep Trueta, Dept Radiol, Girona, Spain
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Dept Breast Imaging, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ Coll Wales, Dept Comp Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Dyfed, Wales
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE | 2008年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
breast density classification; computer-aided diagnostic systems; mammography; parenchymal patterns;
D O I
10.1109/TITB.2007.903514
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
It has been shown that the accuracy of mammographic abnormality detection methods is strongly dependent on the breast tissue characteristics, where a dense breast drastically reduces detection sensitivity. In addition, breast tissue density is widely accepted to be an important risk indicator for the development of breast cancer. Here, we describe the development of an automatic breast tissue classification methodology, which can be summarized in a number of distinct steps: 1) the segmentation of the breast area into fatty versus dense mammographic tissue; 2) the extraction of morphological and texture features from the segmented breast areas; and 3) the use of a Bayesian combination of a number of classifiers. The evaluation, based on a large number of cases from two different mammographic data sets, shows a strong correlation (k = 0.81 and 0.67 for the two data sets) between automatic and expert-based Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System mammographic density assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[31]  
Highnam R., 1999, Mammographic Image Analysis
[32]   Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities [J].
Ho, WT ;
Lam, PWT .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (02) :133-136
[33]   Data clustering: A review [J].
Jain, AK ;
Murty, MN ;
Flynn, PJ .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 1999, 31 (03) :264-323
[34]   Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms [J].
Karssemeijer, N .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (02) :365-378
[35]  
Kittler J., 1986, Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, P59, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-5188-7_8
[36]  
Kopans D., 1998, BREAST IMAGING
[37]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[38]   Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings [J].
Lehman, CD ;
White, E ;
Peacock, S ;
Drucker, MJ ;
Urban, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (06) :1651-1655
[39]   Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: Effect of ROI size and location [J].
Li, H ;
Giger, ML ;
Huo, ZM ;
Olopade, OI ;
Lan, L ;
Weber, BL ;
Bonta, I .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (03) :549-555
[40]   Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms [J].
Li, H ;
Giger, ML ;
Olopade, OI ;
Margolis, A ;
Chinander, MR .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (07) :863-873