Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration

被引:90
作者
Ruiz-Cantu, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Gleadall, Andrew [3 ]
Faris, Callum [4 ]
Segal, Joel [5 ]
Shakesheff, Kevin [2 ]
Yang, Jing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Ctr Addit Mfg, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Fac Sci, Regenerat Med & Cellular Therapies Div, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Loughborough, Wolfson Sch Mech Elect & Mfg Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[4] Poole Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Facial Plast Reconstruct, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[5] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Adv Mfg Technol Res Grp, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 109卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Tissue engineering; Cartilage; Chondrocytes; Bioprinting; 3D printing; Surface porosity; Polycaprolactone; GelMA; Multi-material 3D printing; TISSUE-ENGINEERED CARTILAGE; IN-VITRO; HYDROGELS; CELLS; RECONSTRUCTION; CHONDROCYTES; ALGINATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.msec.2019.110578
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
The current gold standard for nasal reconstruction after rhinectomy or severe trauma includes transposition of autologous cartilage grafts in conjunction with coverage using an autologous skin flap. Harvesting autologous cartilage requires a major additional procedure that may create donor site morbidity. Major nasal reconstruction also requires sculpting autologous cartilages to form a cartilage framework, which is complex, highly skill-demanding and very time consuming. These limitations have prompted facial reconstructive surgeons to explore different techniques such as tissue engineered cartilage. This work explores the use of multi-material 3D bioprinting with chondrocyte-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) to fabricate constructs that can potentially be used for nasal reconstruction. In this study, we have investigated the effect of 3D manufacturing parameters including temperature, needle gauge, UV exposure time, and cell carrier formulation (GelMA) on the viability and functionality of chondrocytes in bioprinted constructs. Furthermore, we printed chondrocyte-laden GelMA and PCL into composite constructs to combine biological and mechanical properties. It was found that 20% w/v GelMA was the best concentration for the 3D bioprinting of the chondrocytes without comprising the scaffold's porous structure and cell functionality. In addition, the 3D bioprinted constructs showed neocartilage formation and similar mechanical properties to nasal alar cartilage after a 50-day culture period. Neocartilage formation was also observed in the composite constructs evidenced by the presence of glycosaminoglycans and collagen type II. This study shows the feasibility of manufacturing neocartilage using chondrocytes/GelMA/PCL 3D bioprinted porous constructs which could be applied as a method for fabricating implants for nose reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
    Jovic, Thomas H.
    Combellack, Emman J.
    Jessop, Zita M.
    Whitaker, Iain S.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2020, 7
  • [42] Regeneration of the female reproductive tract using 3D bioprinting technology
    Sen, Tugce
    Kim, Jongmin
    Jang, Jinah
    Cho, Dong-Woo
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [43] Organ regeneration: integration application of cell encapsulation and 3D bioprinting
    Liu, Huanbao
    Zhou, Huixing
    Lan, Haiming
    Liu, Tianyu
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2017, 12 (04) : 279 - 289
  • [44] Multi-Material Digital Light Processing (DLP) Bioprinting of Heterogeneous Hydrogel Constructs with Perfusable Networks
    Yang, Ming
    Chu, Lang
    Zhuang, Yanfeng
    Qi, Cheng
    Meng, Si
    Liu, Zhou
    Kong, Tiantian
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2024, 34 (32)
  • [45] Is 3D Printing Promising for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration?
    Ege, Duygu
    Hasirci, Vasif
    ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS, 2023, 6 (04) : 1431 - 1444
  • [46] 3D bioprinting of anisotropic engineered tissue constructs with ultrasonically induced cell patterning
    Chansoria, Parth
    Shirwaiker, Rohan
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 32
  • [47] Cell and protein compatible 3D bioprinting of mechanically strong constructs for bone repair
    Sawkins, M. J.
    Mistry, P.
    Brown, B. N.
    Shakesheff, K. M.
    Bonassar, L. J.
    Yang, J.
    BIOFABRICATION, 2015, 7 (03)
  • [48] Physico-biological evaluation of 3D printed dECM/TOCN/alginate hydrogel based scaffolds for cartilage tissue regeneration
    Shanto, Prayas Chakma
    Park, Seongsu
    Park, Myeongki
    Lee, Byong-Taek
    BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES, 2023, 145
  • [49] Inkjet Bioprinting of 3D Silk Fibroin Cellular Constructs Using Sacrificial Alginate
    Compaan, Ashley M.
    Christensen, Kyle
    Huang, Yong
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2017, 3 (08): : 1519 - 1526
  • [50] 3D Bioprinting and Its Role in a Wound Healing Renaissance
    Tanfani, Joseph D.
    Monpara, Jasmin D.
    Jonnalagadda, Sriramakamal
    ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 8 (17)