Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration

被引:90
作者
Ruiz-Cantu, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Gleadall, Andrew [3 ]
Faris, Callum [4 ]
Segal, Joel [5 ]
Shakesheff, Kevin [2 ]
Yang, Jing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Ctr Addit Mfg, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Fac Sci, Regenerat Med & Cellular Therapies Div, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Loughborough, Wolfson Sch Mech Elect & Mfg Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[4] Poole Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Facial Plast Reconstruct, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[5] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Adv Mfg Technol Res Grp, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 109卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Tissue engineering; Cartilage; Chondrocytes; Bioprinting; 3D printing; Surface porosity; Polycaprolactone; GelMA; Multi-material 3D printing; TISSUE-ENGINEERED CARTILAGE; IN-VITRO; HYDROGELS; CELLS; RECONSTRUCTION; CHONDROCYTES; ALGINATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.msec.2019.110578
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
The current gold standard for nasal reconstruction after rhinectomy or severe trauma includes transposition of autologous cartilage grafts in conjunction with coverage using an autologous skin flap. Harvesting autologous cartilage requires a major additional procedure that may create donor site morbidity. Major nasal reconstruction also requires sculpting autologous cartilages to form a cartilage framework, which is complex, highly skill-demanding and very time consuming. These limitations have prompted facial reconstructive surgeons to explore different techniques such as tissue engineered cartilage. This work explores the use of multi-material 3D bioprinting with chondrocyte-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) to fabricate constructs that can potentially be used for nasal reconstruction. In this study, we have investigated the effect of 3D manufacturing parameters including temperature, needle gauge, UV exposure time, and cell carrier formulation (GelMA) on the viability and functionality of chondrocytes in bioprinted constructs. Furthermore, we printed chondrocyte-laden GelMA and PCL into composite constructs to combine biological and mechanical properties. It was found that 20% w/v GelMA was the best concentration for the 3D bioprinting of the chondrocytes without comprising the scaffold's porous structure and cell functionality. In addition, the 3D bioprinted constructs showed neocartilage formation and similar mechanical properties to nasal alar cartilage after a 50-day culture period. Neocartilage formation was also observed in the composite constructs evidenced by the presence of glycosaminoglycans and collagen type II. This study shows the feasibility of manufacturing neocartilage using chondrocytes/GelMA/PCL 3D bioprinted porous constructs which could be applied as a method for fabricating implants for nose reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D Printed Cartilage-Like Tissue Constructs with Spatially Controlled Mechanical Properties
    de Melo, Bruna A. G.
    Jodat, Yasamin A.
    Mehrotra, Shreya
    Calabrese, Michelle A.
    Kamperman, Tom
    Mandal, Biman B.
    Santana, Maria H. A.
    Alsberg, Eben
    Leijten, Jeroen
    Shin, Su Ryon
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2019, 29 (51)
  • [32] 3D bioprinting dual-factor releasing and gradient-structured constructs ready to implant for anisotropic cartilage regeneration
    Sun, Ye
    You, Yongqing
    Jiang, Wenbo
    Wang, Bo
    Wu, Qiang
    Dai, Kerong
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (37)
  • [33] 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell-Laden Tissue Constructs
    Kolesky, David B.
    Truby, Ryan L.
    Gladman, A. Sydney
    Busbee, Travis A.
    Homan, Kimberly A.
    Lewis, Jennifer A.
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2014, 26 (19) : 3124 - 3130
  • [34] Biofabrication of tissue constructs by 3D bioprinting of cell-laden microcarriers
    Levato, Riccardo
    Visser, Jetze
    Planell, Josep A.
    Engel, Elisabeth
    Malda, Jos
    Mateos-Timoneda, Miguel A.
    BIOFABRICATION, 2014, 6 (03)
  • [35] Low-Temperature Extrusion of Waterborne Polyurethane-Polycaprolactone Composites for Multi-Material Bioprinting of Engineered Elastic Cartilage
    Wang, Di
    Feng, Zhaoxuan
    Zeng, Jinshi
    Wang, Qian
    Zheng, Yudong
    Liu, Xia
    Jiang, Haiyue
    MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [36] 3D Bioprinting in Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
    Ostrovidov, Serge
    Salehi, Sahar
    Costantini, Marco
    Suthiwanich, Kasinan
    Ebrahimi, Majid
    Sadeghian, Ramin Banan
    Fujie, Toshinori
    Shi, Xuetao
    Cannata, Stefano
    Gargioli, Cesare
    Tamayol, Ali
    Dokmeci, Mehmet Remzi
    Orive, Gorka
    Swieszkowski, Wojciech
    Khademhosseini, Ali
    SMALL, 2019, 15 (24)
  • [37] 3D bioprinting of cartilage for orthopedic surgeons: reading between the lines
    Di Bella, Claudia
    Fosang, Amanda
    Donati, Davide M.
    Wallace, Gordon G.
    Choong, Peter F. M.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2015, 2
  • [38] Parallel, Multi-Material Electrohydrodynamic 3D Nanoprinting
    Chen, Mojun
    Lee, Heekwon
    Yang, Jihyuk
    Xu, Zhaoyi
    Huang, Nan
    Chan, Barbara Pui
    Kim, Ji Tae
    SMALL, 2020, 16 (13)
  • [39] 3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head
    Idaszek, Joanna
    Costantini, Marco
    Karlsen, Tommy A.
    Jaroszewicz, Jakub
    Colosi, Cristina
    Testa, Stefano
    Fornetti, Ersilia
    Bernardini, Sergio
    Seta, Martyna
    Kasarello, Kaja
    Wrzesien, Robert
    Cannata, Stefano
    Barbetta, Andrea
    Gargioli, Cesare
    Brinchman, Jan E.
    Swieszkowski, Wojciech
    BIOFABRICATION, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [40] 3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review
    McMillan, Alexandra
    McMillan, Nadia
    Gupta, Nikesh
    Kanotra, Sohit P.
    Salem, Aliasger K.
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2023, 12 (19)