Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration

被引:90
作者
Ruiz-Cantu, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Gleadall, Andrew [3 ]
Faris, Callum [4 ]
Segal, Joel [5 ]
Shakesheff, Kevin [2 ]
Yang, Jing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Ctr Addit Mfg, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Fac Sci, Regenerat Med & Cellular Therapies Div, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Loughborough, Wolfson Sch Mech Elect & Mfg Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[4] Poole Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Facial Plast Reconstruct, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[5] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Adv Mfg Technol Res Grp, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 109卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Tissue engineering; Cartilage; Chondrocytes; Bioprinting; 3D printing; Surface porosity; Polycaprolactone; GelMA; Multi-material 3D printing; TISSUE-ENGINEERED CARTILAGE; IN-VITRO; HYDROGELS; CELLS; RECONSTRUCTION; CHONDROCYTES; ALGINATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.msec.2019.110578
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
The current gold standard for nasal reconstruction after rhinectomy or severe trauma includes transposition of autologous cartilage grafts in conjunction with coverage using an autologous skin flap. Harvesting autologous cartilage requires a major additional procedure that may create donor site morbidity. Major nasal reconstruction also requires sculpting autologous cartilages to form a cartilage framework, which is complex, highly skill-demanding and very time consuming. These limitations have prompted facial reconstructive surgeons to explore different techniques such as tissue engineered cartilage. This work explores the use of multi-material 3D bioprinting with chondrocyte-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) to fabricate constructs that can potentially be used for nasal reconstruction. In this study, we have investigated the effect of 3D manufacturing parameters including temperature, needle gauge, UV exposure time, and cell carrier formulation (GelMA) on the viability and functionality of chondrocytes in bioprinted constructs. Furthermore, we printed chondrocyte-laden GelMA and PCL into composite constructs to combine biological and mechanical properties. It was found that 20% w/v GelMA was the best concentration for the 3D bioprinting of the chondrocytes without comprising the scaffold's porous structure and cell functionality. In addition, the 3D bioprinted constructs showed neocartilage formation and similar mechanical properties to nasal alar cartilage after a 50-day culture period. Neocartilage formation was also observed in the composite constructs evidenced by the presence of glycosaminoglycans and collagen type II. This study shows the feasibility of manufacturing neocartilage using chondrocytes/GelMA/PCL 3D bioprinted porous constructs which could be applied as a method for fabricating implants for nose reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recent advances in 3D bioprinting for the regeneration of functional cartilage
    Ji Xiongfa
    Zhu Hao
    Zhao Liming
    Xiao Jun
    REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (01) : 73 - 87
  • [2] Development of a Disposable Single-Nozzle Printhead for 3D Bioprinting of Continuous Multi-Material Constructs
    Cameron, Tiffany
    Naseri, Emad
    MacCallum, Ben
    Ahmadi, Ali
    MICROMACHINES, 2020, 11 (05)
  • [3] Chondroitin and Dermatan Sulfate Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Cartilage Regeneration
    Lafuente-Merchan, Markel
    Ruiz-Alonso, Sandra
    Zabala, Alaitz
    Galvez-Martin, Patricia
    Antonio Marchal, Juan
    Vazquez-Lasa, Blanca
    Gallego, Idoia
    Saenz-del-Burgo, Laura
    Luis Pedraz, Jose
    MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE, 2022, 22 (03)
  • [4] Accurate Calibration in Multi-Material 3D Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering
    Sodupe-Ortega, Enrique
    Sanz-Garcia, Andres
    Pernia-Espinoza, Alpha
    Escobedo-Lucea, Carmen
    MATERIALS, 2018, 11 (08)
  • [5] The emerging role of microfluidics in multi-material 3D bioprinting
    Richard, Cynthia
    Neild, Adrian
    Cadarso, Victor J.
    LAB ON A CHIP, 2020, 20 (12) : 2044 - 2056
  • [6] Emerging Technologies in Multi-Material Bioprinting
    Ravanbakhsh, Hossein
    Karamzadeh, Vahid
    Bao, Guangyu
    Mongeau, Luc
    Juncker, David
    Zhang, Yu Shrike
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2021, 33 (49)
  • [7] 3D Bioprinting Constructs to Facilitate Skin Regeneration
    Daikuara, Luciana Y.
    Chen, Xifang
    Yue, Zhilian
    Skropeta, Danielle
    Wood, Fiona M.
    Fear, Mark W.
    Wallace, Gordon G.
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 32 (03)
  • [8] Clinical translation of 3D bioprinting for cartilage repair: a biomaterial perspective
    Mueller, Eva
    Nomdedeu-Sancho, Gemma
    El-Derby, Azza
    Turunen, Sanna
    Brovold, Matthew
    EMERGENT MATERIALS, 2024, 7 (06) : 2287 - 2304
  • [9] Development of a low-cost quad-extrusion 3D bioprinting system for multi-material tissue constructs
    Zgeib, Ralf
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Zaeri, Ahmadreza
    Zhang, Fucheng
    Cao, Kai
    Chang, Robert C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING, 2024, 10 (01) : 294 - 311
  • [10] 3D Bioprinting of Spatially Heterogeneous Collagen Constructs for Cartilage Tissue Engineering
    Rhee, Stephanie
    Puetzer, Jennifer L.
    Mason, Brooke N.
    Reinhart-King, Cynthia A.
    Bonassar, Lawrence J.
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2016, 2 (10): : 1800 - 1805